User talk:Kittura

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Paanch Ghantey Mien Paanch Crore. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 14:01, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Kavita Radheshyam.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kavita Radheshyam.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ek Tha Tiger

But i am trying to add a Review which is authentic.

Just don't change the format.--almightyvegeta (talk) 21:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I am not changing any Format. Maybe it was by mistake which won't be repeated. I am a regular Wikipedia user.

Hello,critical reception is reverted by me and you are free to add your reviews but just follow the tradition and insert them in descending order as we have seen in every good article.Thanks --Zeeyanketu ✉ 06:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Zeeyanketu. I have now followed the tradation and applied the Review in the end. Hope this helps. If not, Kindly help me in fixing my review in right format. Thanks again. Kittura (talk)(UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. When you recently edited Faisal Saif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kavita Radheshyam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bharla Malwat Rakhtaana.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Bharla Malwat Rakhtaana.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kavita Radheshyam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Main Hoon Rajinikanth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Poster Two.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Poster Two.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kavita Radheshyam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Teaser Poster 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teaser Poster 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Main Hoon Rajinikanth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spoof (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Main Hoon Rajinikanth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Amma (film).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Amma (film).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Amma (film).jpg

Please do not remove CSD until the issue is resolved

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Amma (film).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:13, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Main Hoon Rajinikanth.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Main Hoon Rajinikanth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Faisal Saif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jigyaasa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reema Lagoo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spoof. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Bollywood Films of 2015

Hi there, in these 2 edits, the table for May was left broken and the reference you added was for a different film. I've fixed these for you. I'd appreciate if you'd consider putting the films in alphabetical order when you add new titles, as that's how I've been trying to keep the titles organized. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb (talk) Thank you so much.

Important

Please note my corrections here. If you have queries, please ask me. Tony (talk) 15:19, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of For Adults Only (2016 film)

The article For Adults Only (2016 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not yet notable: principal photography has not yet commenced. Violates WP:CRYSTAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The principal photography has already been commenced and the article will be improved with more sources ( talk )

Nomination of For Adults Only (2016 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article For Adults Only (2016 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For Adults Only (2016 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:34, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The news of the Principal photography of the film is all over from today in all the reliable sources, I think the article now is valid and cannot be nominated for Deletion/Merge Kittura (talk) 20:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The recent news says the maker has officially shelved the film. If any user thinks, the article is appropriate for deletion, the user may continue to delete it Kittura (talk) 21:10, 01 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Main Hoon Rajinikanth page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	I really appreciate your work towards Wikipedia Vaalee (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for appreciating my efforts. Kittura (talk) 18:24, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of For Adults Only (2016 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article For Adults Only (2016 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For Adults Only (2016 film) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 04:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I created the article For Adults Only (2016 film) by gathering some reliable sources. Now i see that the director has officially shelved the film and it will no longer be made. I now feel the article is appropriate for being deleted. Apologies for any inconvenience caused from my side. Kittura (talk) 18:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful

Hi Kittura, in this edit you inexplicably removed all the discussion content from Talk:Kavita Radheshyam. I can only assume this was a mistake, since there would be no valid reason to remove the discussion. In these edits you removed the DMY template with no justification, and you removed maintenance templates without fixing the problems. The content still comes off as promotional and still requires grammar, typography and tone cleanup. Please double check your edits, because persistent edits of this sort will appear as disruptive to other editors. If you wish to comment, please feel free to reply here. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cyphoidbomb, I am still trying to clean the Article with a proper maintenance. As far as your opinion about the Article coming off as Promotional is not agreeable. If you google Kavita Radheshyam-Kim Kardashian, you will come across many trusted outlets and sources which claims the same. If these sources sound promotional, Then most of the Articles on Celebrities here are Promotional.

Daily Mail Source ^[1] clearly claims celebrities from around the world who are dubbed and tagged as Kim Kardashian. Another source, Movie News Guide ^[2] also claims the same along with several other outlets available on the net. I apologize, i removed the discussion as i thought the whole discussion was baseless. If you feel you want to invite more users in the discussion, it's your choice. Kittura (talk) 00:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Amma (film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amma (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why have i been Blocked?

I have never tried to violated any Wikipedia rules and i am an active author. Just on the basis of suspicion of some other author with whom i might have interacted very few? Please check my contributions and compare with the block user! I would hereby like to request to please unblock me Kittura (talk) 02:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kittura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The allegation of suspicion on me as a user is not valid. I was not even informed or even warned about this Block. I never violated any rules of Wikipedia. I think it's been done by mistake

Decline reason:

You were blocked by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet account. (Note that sockpuppet accounts do not get warnings before being blocked.) "I am not a sock" is an argument the vast majority of sockpuppets use to try to get unblocked; it is not an argument that will result in unblocking. You need to provide convincing evidence as to why you are not Vaalee despite CU saying you are if you are to be unblocked. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:43, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Materialscientist:, is this a checkuser-based block? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have no clue about this. I am a movie Publicist here in India and i am regular Wikipedia user and contributor. To access my internet i use a local cyber in my area where i live in. There are several other Journalists and Publicists who uses the same Cyber from my area because that local Cyber is a meeting joint for all of us. I suddenly noticed my account was blocked by :@Materialscientist: Kittura (talk) 01:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please, compare this account with Vaalee. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm declining the CU request. Materialscientist is a CheckUser and blocked the master and the three puppet accounts. I assume he either checked himself or felt a check wasn't needed (based on the block logs and userpage tags). I see no point to another CheckUser checking. If Materialscientist wants to comment here, he can. If not, not.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kittura. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3280871/Kim-Kardashians-world-glamorous-Aussie-stylist-curvy-Cuban-millionaire-singer-China-vying-selfie-obsessed-star-s-crown.html

[2] ttp://www.movienewsguide.com/meet-kim-kardashians-world/111008

[1]

[2]