User talk:BilboBeggins

Hello, I'm Amberrock. I noticed that you recently removed content from The 100 (TV series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 21:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christmas Next Door

Hello, Кирилл С1

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TomCat4680 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Christmas Next Door, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TomCat4680}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TomCat4680 (talk) 12:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ronald Gutiérrez (referee) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ronald Gutiérrez (referee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald Gutiérrez (referee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Samuel E. Wright

On 2 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Samuel E. Wright, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 23:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ned Beatty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gator. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Wayne Duvall has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wayne Duvall. Thanks! Tame (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tame IMDB is not used for citation here, and I know the attitude to IMDB. There are lots of sources on this prolific actor, some sources are mentioned here: [1]. Kirill C1 (talk) 14:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wayne Duvall (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources that are provided do not show that the subject is worthy of an article, that is, the sources do mention the subject, but it fails significant coverage. Significant coverage' means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.

Moreover, the roles that he played in movies are very small roles, even many of them are uncredited. Also the video games section do not have any reference to support the claims. Additional voiceover role does not make anyone notable.

This article can only be accepted if the subject has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is only then presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wayne Duvall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wayne Duvall, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 14:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Кирилл С1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tame (talk) 14:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Moreover, the roles that he played in movies are very small roles, even many of them are uncredited." - this is not the case, the only his uncredited role is in Quiet Place 2, and ironically, it has coverage: [2] (a paragraph, which is good combined with other sources), so it is essentially cameo. These were not very small roles, see Edge of Darkness, O Brother. Had supporting role in at least several Academy award nominated films and had multiple recurring roles in TV series, by Wikipedia standards this is more than enough. Did you thoroughly analyse his filmography - I do not understand this "Additional voiceover role does not make anyone notable" remark (voice roles is not remaotely close to his best, or better known roles such as District or Pearson recurring role, or In the valley of Ellah significant role, or others. Kirill C1 (talk) 15:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Кирилл С1, by "the roles that he played in movies are very small roles, even many of them are uncredited." I referred to the existing articles on these movies in Wikipedia. While there is some mention of him in several articles of these movies, some of the articles themselves need additional references. In films database webpages the camera personels are even credited, that do not make them notable. "Did you thoroughly analyse his filmography". In any case, my review was based on the references and info that were present in the draft, linking an article from Screenrant website in this talk page is not gonna do anything. You should find more reliable and independent sources that mentions the subject significantly (not just trivial mention), and add them in the draft, then resubmit. Surely I or another reviewer might accept it if it then seems to meet the requirements. -- Tame (talk) 06:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lindsey Gort (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lindsey Gort and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lindsey Gort, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 14:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from maybe second sentence in career section, I don't see any advertising - I already rewrote in neutral way. I don't think that writing that Catrall having congratulated her makes it unencyclopedic. It's not different to hundreds of other articles on actors where their roles are listed. Purely the facts are given. Kirill C1 (talk) 14:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Leonid Kuravlyov

On 4 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Leonid Kuravlyov, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 01:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Кирилл С1

Thank you for creating Jack Kehler.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Кирилл С1

Thank you for creating Lina Roessler.

User:Paul W, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This needs some improvement to references. At the moment, the article is heavily dependent upon citations focused upon interviews which may be regarded as primary sources (see Wikipedia:Interviews). Some of the other current citations make only fleeting mentions of the subject - notability requires substantial coverage in reliable independent sources (see WP:RS).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Paul W (talk) 11:02, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lina Roessler moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lina Roessler, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 11:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It meets notability guidelines per WP:DIRECTOR - her work was reviewed. There is coverage on her. Kirill C1 (talk) 16:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tommy Lane (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flipper.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lina Roessler (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lina Roessler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 08:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Davies (snooker player) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ryan Davies (snooker player), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:43, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You said what I said, but so much more succinctly...

[3] I giggled. --Jayron 32 19:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christmas Next Door for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christmas Next Door is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas Next Door until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 11:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Webster (actor) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Derek Webster (actor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 16:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ryan Davies (snooker player)

Hello, Кирилл С1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ryan Davies (snooker player), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your removal of the tree from Deaths in 2023

Hi. The article is not called Human deaths in 2023 - believe it or not, any organic living thing which can be measured by age, and has a Wikipedia article written already, can be listed in Deaths in 2023. Please take a look at consensus partly confirmed at Talk:Deaths in 2023/Archive 1#Animals to acquaint yourself of the archived discussion on this. (And it's not just animals, before you point that out.) The entry has been restored. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that animals can die, but plants can't die. Kirill C1 (talk) 22:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have read this small discussion and I don't see consensus for posting plants. Kirill C1 (talk) 22:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's as may be, but previous discussions have covered plant life. And of course plants can die - they don't live forever (nothing does). You are welcome to bring the subject up once more at Talk:Deaths in 2023, but I can assure you that further removals of this type will always be reverted (not just by myself but by other regular editors familiar with the consensus on living organisms dying), until such time as consensus shifts to exclude them. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 22:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have just opened a new section at Talk:Deaths in 2023 dealing with plants in the Deaths list when there is already a discussion in progress on that page. Post your opinions there, and please stop being so disruptive. Ref ^(chew)(do) 18:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You told me to "bring the subject up once more at Talk:Deaths in 2023". It's obvious that I didn't see the other topic because I saw only names of topics and only had brief glance at them and didn't recognise that this was already open. Kirill C1 (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've fixed the situation by combining the two sections, okay? Ref ^(chew)(do) 20:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Derek Webster (actor)

Hello, Кирилл С1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Derek Webster (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derek Webster (actor) (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 14 novembre were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Derek Webster (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 09:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derek Webster (actor) has been accepted

Derek Webster (actor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 15:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Derek Webster (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derek Webster (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Webster (actor) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yuri Lushchai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yuri Lushchai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuri Lushchai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 00:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Foronjy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Repo Man. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yuri Lushchai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yuri Lushchai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuri Lushchai (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 02:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]