User talk:Kirby1706

PROD Removal

Hi, I noticed that you removed part of the Proposed Deletion template from 2022 Missouri State Auditor election. If you meant to contest the proposed deletion, you should remove all lines from

{{Proposed deletion/dated

to

}}

. — csc^-1 03:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2022 United States Senate election in Missouri

I'm not sure why you removed Ron Deets? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed him for the same reason for why he was removed as a Republican candidate for the same race. Kirby1706 (talk)

Assuming good faith

Hi, I notice that you are continuously accusing another editor of committing vandalism in your edit summaries and in Talk:2022 United States Senate election in Missouri. Please note that vandalism on Wikipedia means "editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose"; someone is only considered to have committed vandalism when it's clear that their intent is to disrupt Wikipedia. These edits surrounding whether polls should be labeled as partisan or not is definitely not vandalism in that sense. Please know that in these cases where you think an edit is unconstructive but is actually not vandalism, you should assume good faith. Thanks. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 23:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When someone calls a poll or pollster partisan it's an attempt to discredit the accuracy of the poll and pollster. Remington Research has been the only consistently accurate pollster in Missouri in the last decade and the user attacking them is an attempt to discredit the pollster, their data, and Wikipedia. There is a reason why a left-of-center newsgroup used them and continues to use them for their polls. It is hard for me to see it as good faith when they are trying to drag the only constantly accurate pollster in Missouri name into the mud by calling them partisan. Kirby1706 (talk) 00:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Eric Greitens. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit people's user pages, as you did here. Direct comments to user talk pages instead (pages that begin with "User talk" instead of "User"). Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:12, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I was, didn't mean to. Kirby1706 (talk) 23:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Pro-life" is not neutral. Neither is "pro-choice". – Muboshgu (talk) 23:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With the context given by Aoi it makes more sense. Kirby1706 (talk) 23:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]