Talk:2022 United States Senate election in Missouri

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Endorsements

Can someone source the endorsements Anish631 (talk) 07:32, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Anish631[reply]

Definition of a partisan poll for the person who doesn't understand it

Partisanship is determined by who sponsors the poll, rather than who conducts it. Polls are considered partisan if they’re conducted on behalf of a candidate, party, campaign committee, or PAC, super PAC, 501(c)(4), 501(c)(5) or 501(c)(6) organization that conducts a large majority of its political activity on behalf of one political party. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirby1706 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the "definition" of a partisan poll, it's merely the criteria used by a single website to determine whether to apply a 4-point shift to it in their database for their polling averages. They literally describe themselves as a Republican polling firm, it's how they're described in the news media, and it's consistent with how these labels are used on Wikipedia. Stroopwafels (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but you are labeling the polls as partisan, which they are not. This is also not standard around Wikipedia, so now you are lying as well as committing vandalism. Kirby1706 (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:OWN and WP:VAND. You can look at literally any non-Missouri related election article to see that this is not the case (e.g. 2022 Kansas gubernatorial election#Polling, 2022 Arkansas gubernatorial election#Polling, 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Texas#Polling 11, etc.) I will concede that this is not the standard that has been applied everywhere or even on all articles recently, but it seems pretty clear that it is at least a de facto standard to which editors attempt to apply in updating these lists. Stroopwafels (talk) 23:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Justification for John Wood

Simply asking on what grounds are we putting an independent candidate of no major standing on the election banner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babylonian Macedon (talk • contribs) 20:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's likely because he polled more than 5% in the latest SurveyUSA poll listed here. —twotwofourtysix^{(talk || edits)} 00:48, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schmitt is the nominee already?

@JacksonianDemocrat: You changed the infobox to have Schmitt as the nominee, without updating the article or providing a source. The results I'm looking at only show 11% reporting and no winner called. If you don't provide a source, this change will need to be reverted. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 01:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just called by CNN (with much more of the vote in), so I will add a source myself. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 01:58, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Trudy Busch Valentine (cropped).jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Lucas Kunce Head Shot.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August Busch Endorsements

Someone removed the source on his endorsement of Schmitt. If someone could find it that would be appreciated. Kirby1706 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]