Jump to content

User talk:King wiston

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, King wiston! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Bongwarrior 05:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Australia

[edit]

King wiston,

  1. Please stop adding more material to the Australia infobox. It is more than long enough already, and most of what you have added is not important enough to be included in such a summary. If you think something really is worth including, then discuss the sitation on the discussion page, Talk:Australia before making any more changes. JPD (talk) 13:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Please avoid adding material in capital letters unless it is absolutely essential. "FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY" is not essential. Green Giant (talk) 06:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More Australia

[edit]

If you add God Save the Queen as the anthem, or add the honorific HM to the Queen again, you will be blocked. They are both against style and consensus. --Stephen 10:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:SSA41083.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:SSA41110.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SSA41110.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Centrl Park tower

[edit]

Not too sure what you are trying to do there - maybe you need to try again - it looked like vandalism - maybe you need to do an edit summary of what you actually trying to do SatuSuro 12:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SSA41110.JPG missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:SSA41110.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 08:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note, your earlier edit to the image's page did not add the appropriate information asked for in January, it just corrupted a template. --AussieLegend (talk) 08:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Australia info-box

[edit]

Unless I have missed something you have been asked before not to add material to this info-box. If I am wrong then please let me know - but if not then could you please discuss this appropriately at the talk page before again adjusting. With thanks--VS talk 03:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Australia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You have previously been asked not to add this information on several occasions. AussieLegend (talk) 13:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Australia, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 02:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus

[edit]

When the community agrees with something, you are required not to break that consensus unless consensus itself changes. Until that consensus changes, do not add monarchy/gg to Prime Ministerial infoboxes, as they will continue to be removed whenever you add them. Thanks. Timeshift (talk) 04:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Wikipedia consensus discussion has resolved that we will not have the GG/Queen in the infobox, and that overrides all. Thankyou. Timeshift (talk) 07:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to India. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 15:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to China, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 15:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Hi King wiston, you seem to be uploading images from "unconfirmed websites". Please note that generally images on websites are covered by copyright. Which website(s) are you getting these images from? Somno (talk) 05:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than edit warring over including photos in the Perth article, please try to address people's concerns. Where are the images from? How can we verify whether your uncle took them? Somno (talk) 05:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:2660385237 bd28b28e74.jpg

[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:2660385237 bd28b28e74.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. cygnis insignis 05:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC) --cygnis insignis 05:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image is at Flickr. It is either compromising your privacy or someone's copyright. Please do not revert a fourth time. If you need assistance in adding a licence, let me know. cygnis insignis 06:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perth, Western Australia

[edit]

I don't dispute that your uncle took the photo you have uploaded for the Perth, Western Australia article, but its copyright status is currently disputed. Please take care of the image status before adding it to any article because, as it stands, it is going to be deleted and will leave the article without an image. An image's copyright status needs to be clear before it is added to an article and there's really no reason to replace one that is free with one that has questionable rights at the moment (again, not questioning you, just stating what is on the image's page). I would also suggest bringing up changing the infobox's photo on the talk page before doing so. Another image of the skyline could probably be added to the article itself especially since another image is already in Commons. Pinkadelica (talk) 06:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/King wiston for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. cygnis insignis 15:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:2537556779 f3d07ac359.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:25, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:369325040 247edde5cf-1-.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:369325040 247edde5cf-1-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:2660385237 bd28b28e74.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/22766589@N08/2660385237/. As a copyright violation, Image:2660385237 bd28b28e74.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:2660385237 bd28b28e74.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:2660385237 bd28b28e74.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:2660385237 bd28b28e74.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:2660385237 bd28b28e74.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 03:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:2537556779 f3d07ac359.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/27136329@N03/2537556779/. As a copyright violation, Image:2537556779 f3d07ac359.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:2537556779 f3d07ac359.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:2537556779 f3d07ac359.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:2537556779 f3d07ac359.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:2537556779 f3d07ac359.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 03:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of AWDT

[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on AWDT, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because AWDT was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting AWDT, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Comm001full.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.rbb.com.au/projects-commercial.asp. As a copyright violation, Image:Comm001full.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Comm001full.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Comm001full.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Comm001full.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Comm001full.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 12:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Project-01-full.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cfdonline.com.au/projects.asp. As a copyright violation, Image:Project-01-full.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Project-01-full.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Project-01-full.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Project-01-full.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Project-01-full.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Bidgee (talk) 12:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning: if you continue to upload images and provide fraudulent copyright claims over them, you will be blocked from contributing to Wikipedia. - Mark 10:45, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Nla.pic-an23194126.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an23194126. As a copyright violation, Image:Nla.pic-an23194126.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Nla.pic-an23194126.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Nla.pic-an23194126.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Nla.pic-an23194126.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Nla.pic-an23194126.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 10:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This image is clearly not in the public domain, since the cut-off for photographs in Australia is currently around 1955, and this photograph shows the completed bridge (which was finished in 1959). I'm deleting it. - Mark 11:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:AustraliaP39b-5Dollars-(1969)-donated f.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:AustraliaP39b-5Dollars-(1969)-donated f.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:AustraliaP39b-5Dollars-(1969)-donated f.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nancy talk 13:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for socking. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Cirt (talk) 11:08, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image source problem with Image:SC2 140-1-.gif

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:SC2 140-1-.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:SC2 140-1-.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Bidgee (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Woodside Plaza

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 15 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Woodside Plaza, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 10:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 0057.jpg missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:IMG 0057.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:36, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 0057.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 0057.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:King_wiston&oldid=1088034562"