User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2013/09

Nomination of Dina Wein-Reis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dina Wein-Reis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dina Wein-Reis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:03, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Takes Brooklyn! Saturday September 7

Please join Wikipedia Takes Brooklyn scavenger hunt on September 7, 2013!
Everyone gather at the Brooklyn Public Library to further Wikipedia's coverage of—
photos and articles related to Brooklyn, its neighborhoods and the local landmarks.
--EdwardsBot (talk)

User:King of Hearts/closetfd.js

Hello! Could you please fix you User:King of Hearts/closetfd.js script, by replacing "Templates for deletion" with "Templates for discussion". Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doug/closetfd.js has the updated version already. If you want to import all my highly similar XfD-related scripts, just use User:King of Hearts/closexfd.js. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:39, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. They are all in js subpage, just the TFD one didn't work. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify... you imported User:King of Hearts/closexfd.js and the TfD script didn't work? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, I imported User:King of Hearts/closetfd.js I meant, I use all the scripts on User:King of Hearts/closexfd.js already. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:01, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

In the media: Manning "put back in the closet"; State involvement in Azerbaijani Wikipedia

News and notes: Privacy policy debate gears up

Traffic report: No accounting for the wisdom of crowds

Discussion report: Arbcom election procedures, Wiki Loves Monuments, Privacy policy, FDC, and more

Featured content: Bridging the way to a Peasants' Revolt

WikiProject report: Writing on the frontier: Psychology on Wikipedia

Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case opens; Tea Party case closes ; Infoboxes nears completion

Technology report: Making Wikipedia more accessible

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

In the media: Lawyer goes to court to discover Wikipedian's identity; Storming Wikipedia; Wikimedia UK Secretary in conflict-of-interest controversy; Does Wikipedia need a "right to reply" box?

WikiProject report: WikiProject Indonesia

Featured content: Tintin goes featured

News and notes: As deadline approaches, Individual Engagement Grants looks for ideas

Traffic report: Syria, celebrities, and association football: oh my!

Arbitration report: Workshop phase opens in Manning naming dispute ; Infoboxes case closes

DRV for Poonam Pandey

Hello! I have never raised a deletion review before. But the process tells me that i should discuss the issue with the deleting admin first. Although the AfD is quite outdated and as my reason for undeletion is new information available about the subject which i count as addition to their notability, am not sure whether i should bother you like this or not. Anyways... Since the deletion of article in April 2013, where you noted that the subject is notable for just one event (The event was proposing to strip after India wins the Cricket World Cup, but not actually stripping and the media hype followed thereupon), this model has been the lead actress of the film Nasha which released in July 2013. She obviously doesn't pass the WP:NACTOR with just one film, but she surely passed WP:GNG then and also now. The article was kept after the first AfD. This film simply takes her out of the WP:BLP1E. Would you reconsider undeleting the article? Or as i doubted before, should i approach DRV directly? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, go ahead and file the DRV. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done that at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 September 14. Thanks! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What happens

If someone's been given the standard offer, and then they create sock accounts during that 6 month period, what happens next? Does the six-month timer get reset, or does the user get permanently site-banned?? 76.226.112.215 (talk) 21:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]