User talk:KieranMaher

Welcome!

Hello, KieranMaher, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 13:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:KieranMaher/Block wikibooks

The page User:KieranMaher/Block wikibooks has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 13:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, Amanda. I'm now over the moon. Its really made my day and I hope you have a nice one too! KieranMaher (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

duh?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KieranMaher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Amanda acted autocratically KieranMaher (talk) 13:43, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have never ever harassed anyone, including Amanda - it seems to be associated with their perception of the situation, which seems very limited - see comment above KieranMaher (talk) 13:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Requests containing personal attacks are not considered. 331dot (talk) 13:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KieranMaher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never ever harassed anyone. Please explain your actions in plain english marz KieranMaher (talk) 07:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Only one open request at a time, please. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 08:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KieranMaher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never ever made a 'personal attack' nor harassed Amanda NP. Please explain your actions so I can fully understand why you are treating me so unfairly (in my culture at least!) marz KieranMaher (talk) 07:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've worked hard to continue your personal attacks here, over and over and over again. It won't work. Yamla (talk) 10:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please explain Yamla. Your definition of 'personal attack' is ridiculous according to my understanding of the words. Quote the offending words and justify your action in a way that any reasonable person can understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KieranMaher (talk • contribs) 10:38, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And Yamla, please demonstrate explicitly how I have "worked hard to continue" my "personal attacks" and please demonstrate where I have done it "over and over and over again". Any rational interpretation of what I wrote ("Thank you so much, Amanda. I'm now over the moon. Its really made my day and I hope you have a nice one too! ") would arrive at the conclusion that there is no evidence of "You've worked hard to continue your personal attacks here, over and over and over again". I find your comments abusive KieranMaher (talk) 11:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

why only one request at a time? What policy precedes this a activity? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KieranMaher (talk • contribs) 08:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You already have a request open. Opening multiple requests at the same time will not speed up a review of your block in any way. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 08:18, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

and... what do you mean? More discriminatory activity by you guys? KieranMaher (talk) 08:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can literally only appear in the category once. I have no idea what you're on about with the discrimination accusation. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 08:27, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

why? only once? KieranMaher (talk) 08:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because pages can only appear in a category once each. It's the way the software works. Opening new requests will not 'bump' your request in any way, or speed your request up in any way. They simply add your talkpage to a category. I still don't understand your accusation of discrimination. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 08:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

re: discriminatory stuff - see earlier entries on this page. I do not care that your software is very limited - i suggest u do something about it KieranMaher (talk) 08:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't involved with earlier entries on the page, and have not read them. I suggest you explain how I've discriminated against you. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 08:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By continuing the meta - simple KieranMaher (talk) 08:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, I haven't discriminated against you, and you have no case to make here. Got it. I would suggest that you rethink your approach with other reviewing admins. I'm going to unwatch this page now, and will not see any further replies. I wish you the best of luck with your request. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 08:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Such ignorance is a characteristic of the world we now live in KieranMaher (talk) 08:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Calling someone an autocrat is a personal attack which is why I rejected your initial request out of hand. You had harassed another user by posting on their user page(which is only for the named user to post to as well). 331dot (talk) 09:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
When someone's behaviour is obviously autocratic - I call it out in all honesty - and with sincerity. You might have other values.... KieranMaher (talk) 09:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KieranMaher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not work "hard to continue your personal attacks here, over and over and over again. It won't work. As stated by Yamla. She's obviously confused. marz KieranMaher (talk) 12:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. Go Phightins! 12:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KieranMaher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never made any 'personal attack' on anyone. Why are you harassing me? I'm now at the end of my tether. Kieran (an active wikipedia donator) marz KieranMaher (talk) 10:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think some examples of problematic edits include [1] [2] etc. If you want to return to editing, I'd suggest you let some time pass, and then make a new unblock request that addresses the behavior that led to this block as well as articulate a plan for what you would like to do on WP moving forward. Until then, insulting other editors and making vague insinuations about donations to WMF are not going to get you anywhere, except perhaps having talk page access revoked. Go Phightins! 12:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for enlightening me about your bullying behaviour Go Phightins. I see you don't understand 1) i made no threatening comments; 2) i didn't do things over and over and over again as Yamla stated. Show me the evidence and please stop harassing and bullying me — Preceding unsigned comment added by KieranMaher (talk • contribs) 12:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KieranMaher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Irrational reason given by Go Phightins without addressing my basic questions in any reasonable terms marz KieranMaher (talk) 12:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Go Phightins! 12:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]