User talk:Khushurundla

AfC notification: Draft:Bobas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bobas. Thanks! Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at RRR (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Do not change sourced content. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at RRR (film), you may be blocked from editing. Ab207 (talk) 04:41, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I AM ADDING SOURCE WAIT A MINUTE PLEASE Khushurundla (talk) 04:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a verified reference and the old one was in a regional language( Telugu) and this on e is in English. Khushurundla (talk) 05:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khushurundla. Please note that Sacnilk is not a reliable source. Wikipedia uses established media houses as reliable sources (see WP:ICTFSOURCES for a list of acceptable sources). The issue is not language but reliabiliy. Just because the source is in English does not mean its better. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 05:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ab207,

I understand the thing but Sacnilk is more reliable than the previously source which was not a media house merely a site which gives information only about celebrities and their movies.

But still I am accepting my apology and further will not cite Sacnilk as a reference source rather I will use a proper reliable source.

Thanks and Have a nice Day! Khushurundla (talk) 06:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding. If you have any queries about the content or sources related to the film, you can bring them on the article talk page. Cheers -- Ab207 (talk) 08:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bobas (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lil-unique1 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Jaipur. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough information to warrant a standard alone page. Fails WP:GNG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bobas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bobas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khushurundla! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bobas

Hello, Khushurundla. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bobas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bobas

Hello, Khushurundla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bobas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]