User talk:Khunpolrattachana

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Glyphoglossus viejus (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glyphoglossus viejus.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker ^talk 06:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Glyphoglossus viejus concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Glyphoglossus viejus, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Glyphoglossus viejus

Hello Khunpolrattachana. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Glyphoglossus viejus".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Glyphoglossus viejus}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boiga siamensis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Plains and Nan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Red-necked chorus frog

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Khunpolrattachana, thanks for creating Red-necked chorus frog!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please could you sort out the referencing, plus clarify the 3rd sentence in the Habitat section. Please also add further categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 19:17, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Red necked chorus frog

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Red necked chorus frog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Exists at Red-necked chorus frog. There is no need for a project page, likely created here by mistake.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. LynxTufts (talk) 19:37, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Red-necked chorus frog and Leptolalax zapzorzen

You seem to have created the same article multiple times under different names. There is no need to repeat information for each name a subject may be known by. If it is known by other names, it should be under a page titled with the subject's most common name, and the other names can redirect to that page. In this case, I believe the Red-necked chorus frog page should remain, and the Leptolalax zapzorzen page should redirect to it. Let me know if you have questions on this. LynxTufts (talk) 19:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leptolalax zapzorzen

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Leptolalax zapzorzen, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Plantdrew (talk) 20:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boiga siamensis naranjita

The article Boiga siamensis naranjita has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be original research. Not supported by cited references (which aren't reliable sources). Zero Google Scholar hits. Zero Google hits apart from Wikipedia mirrors.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul_012 (talk) 07:35, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Boiga siamensis naranjita for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boiga siamensis naranjita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boiga siamensis naranjita until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paul_012 (talk) 02:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]