User talk:Khuft

Khuft's Talk Page

Title Namimg

I noticed you mentioned the naming of Mitrovica on the talk page, could you please give your opinion at Talk:Kosovska Mitrovica#Mitrovica? Regards IJA (talk) 12:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charles III requested move discussion

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brand New Low

Just a courtesy call on this fine(?) Monday morning to let you know a discussion you might have wanted to participate in regarding the destruction of a heritage site has reopened for a limited time (and this header is only a polite suggestion on how you may want to refer to any "sad new highlight" in the future). InedibleHulk (talk) 06:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! I saw it a couple of minutes ago, and already added my comment / vote. Khuft (talk) 06:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I regret not telling you sooner; you two could have been consecutive voters. Oh well. On a related note, I'm (perhaps too) impressed by the long run of even numbers you've racked up in contribution history lately! The content seems reasonable, too. Keep on keeping on (if you can, on the former point). InedibleHulk (talk) 07:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN tagging

Hey there Khuft! I appreciate you trying to tag articles with the ITN note template, but many of the article you tagged have already been tagged. I appreciate if you could please take a look at the talk page for the article before tagging it, so we don't end up with 2 tags. I have gone through your history and removed your duplicate tags (some were already removed by other users as well). Sincerest well-wishes! Scientia potentia est, MonarchOfTerror 11:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Monarch of Terror, sorry for that. Since clicking on "tag" always created a new section on the pages, I didn't notice this had already been added at the very top together with other tags - I just checked whether an ITN section had been created at the bottom of the respective talk page. Will look more carefully going forward. Thx for bringing it to my attention! Khuft (talk) 19:42, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mykola Lysenko

It's hardly pro-Russian to acknowledge that the region was part of the Russian Empire and as such he was Russian in nationality. ... discospinster _talk 23:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's stated in the article and infobox that the region was part of the Russian Empire, so that's hardly a hidden fact. What is pro-Russian proganda is just adding the word "Russian" somewhere in the first paragraph just to make a point. Khuft (talk) 23:45, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:NATIONALITY states that the first paragraph of a biography should provide context about the place where the individual became notable: "In most modern-day cases, this will be the country, region, or territory where the person is currently a national or permanent resident; or, if the person is notable mainly for past events, where the person was such when they became notable." In this case it's the Russian Empire. ... discospinster _talk 23:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no time for your POV pushing. I also saw I was not the only one to revert your vandalism. You try the same tactic at Adam Mickiewicz, who also born in what was technically the Russian Empire, and see how far that gets you. Khuft (talk) 00:08, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need to, I'm sure someone will correct it eventually. ... discospinster _talk 00:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]