User talk:Khodkenilesh

Welcome!

Hello, Khodkenilesh, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Aramm, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Ravensfire (talk) 15:43, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Domain Name System and Modem. Your edits have been reverted. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 09:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mean as custard (talk) 09:42, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Computer hardware. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —Bruce1ee^talk 15:51, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khodkenilesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have spam, I accept it. Unnecessary links were added without seeing a policy on YouTube. Which were against the policy. Now after your message I read the policy well and what is the need to go and what is spamming. I promise that I will not spamming further than all rules will follow. I will make my necessary contribution. I request you please give me an opportunity again.

Decline reason:

You were repeatedly warned about your additions of external links above. Why did you continue after these warnings? Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What will you edit about if unblocked? If you work for a company for which you have been editing, you must disclose that per the policies WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 10:34, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khodkenilesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not work for any company I'm an individual blogger I only write on my blog. This is my blog's URL. https://technicallearners.com

Decline reason:

You have to answer Yunshui's question and you have to answer 331dot's question. Yamla (talk) 11:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please answer Yunshui's question above, and please tell what it is you intend to edit about if unblocked. Would you also agree to not edit about or link to your blog? 331dot (talk) 11:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khodkenilesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The truth is that I was trying to backlink my blog. It was my stupid But I assure you that I will not put any link except content, especially my blog. I am a technical blogger. I would like to contribute to science and technology. Now your wish is what you like Thank you.This answer is the question of all of you

Decline reason:

You failed to answer the question posted above: Why did you continue to spam after you were warned several times not to do so? How can we trust you that you will be following policies if you are not able to respect decent warnings? Vanjagenije (talk) 16:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.