User talk:Khayyam 77

Welcome!

Hello, Khayyam 77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Shrike (talk) 14:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I might actually need some help accessing some material online, for the project I'm working on. Khayyam 77 (talk) 22:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Bir Abu Matar— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 03:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Samf4u: Hello. Could you please explain to me why you think the sections you have removed - most of the article, really - are not constructive? I am taking most of my material from the article with the same title on the Hebrew Wikipedia, plus - if you look at my list of references - I am also using a book I have on the subject. So, I'm doing quite serious work, I don't understand why you are saying that I am experimenting.... Khayyam 77 (talk) 03:16, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept my apology, I made a series of errors with Huggle and have reverted. - Samf4u (talk) 03:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, all good! And thank you for fixing it so quickly. Khayyam 77 (talk) 03:24, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For the work on Israel Archaeology articles Shrike (talk) 08:11, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Shrike: Thanks! Khayyam 77 (talk) 09:36, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit at Archaeology of Israel

Hi. I reverted you there. That section should reflect the main points in the main article, see WP:SUMMARY. And of course it should be sourced to academic books and journals, which it wasn't. There's another problem I just noticed. The history article and this one should use the same terminology for the Iron Age, IMHO. Doug Weller talk 12:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Hey. I don't see how it fails to reflect the main points of the main article, it just covers a a portion of the period covered in the main article. Other section in the article I'm editing cover other portions. I have sources, meant to add them later. As for terminology - can you please clarify, maybe give me an example? Khayyam 77 (talk) 13:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking of:

Iron Age I (IA I) 1200–1000 BCE Iron Age IIA (IA IIA) 1000–925 BCE

Iron Age IIB-C (IA IIB-C) 925–586 BCE

Iron Age III 586–539 BCE (Neo-Babylonian period) The History article has Iron Age I: 1200–1000 BCE Iron Age II: 1000–586 BCE Your version is probably better but they need to match. I'd like most of the section headings to match. And, for instance: "Israel (traditionally referred to as BitUmri - House of Omri, named after the founder of the dynasty - in ancient sources) reached its peak in the 9th century BC, under the Omrides (c.885 - 835 BC). Two great administrative centers were built, either by Omri or by Ahab, one in the capital, Samaria, and the Other in Jezreel, in the north". The history article doesn't mention Jezreel (the city), Bitumri or suggest that Ahab might have built an administrative center. In fact, everything I reverted was about history except the platforms. That's not what we should have in an archaeology article. And as I said, it really needs sourcing. The history needs to be in the history section, appropriately sourced. The archaeology article should cover the major finds for each period. Then the history article can reflect that. This discussion probably belongs on the talk age. Doug Weller talk 15:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller:The history article could use some work, IMO, and I have sources for all my material. But I understand what you meant now, thanks. Khayyam 77 (talk) 20:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Khayyam 77. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 20:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Khayyam 77/Afedism

User:Khayyam 77/Afedism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Khayyam 77/Afedism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Khayyam 77/Afedism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:42, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]