User talk:Khaliwarriors

Please stop editing as your wish as you did in Hindu Mythological Wars.

If you wish to add, the content must be accepted but not contradict the original content. Be careful. Vandalism might lead to block of your account.

Vandalism

Hello... it it noticed that your edits on article Hindu mythological wars seems to be unconstructive. If you feel content has to be modified and repaired please mention your views in talk pages but don't change as your wish. Hope you understood Fire star on heat (talk) 05:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Your recent editing history at Hindu mythological wars shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 09:34, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khaliwarriors, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Khaliwarriors! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Read the talk page before making any major edits. SpicyBiryani (talk) 11:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 02:19, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 China–India skirmishes

Please stop edit-warring over a single source. Only US News & World Report claims 35 Chinese soldiers were killed. However, Indian intercepts of American intelligence reports state that there were 35 casualties: [1]. Claiming 35 were killed based on one news site which could be making a mistake is not proper. Hence the word "casualties" is appropriate. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 08:13, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Fire star on heat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Malla-yuddha have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Fire star on heat (talk) 15:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Brahmashirsha astra. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Fire star on heat (talk) 16:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 2008 attacks on Christians in southern Karnataka, you may be blocked from editing. SUN EYE 1 18:14, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at 2008 attacks on Christians in southern Karnataka. SUN EYE 1 14:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Militant is not declared by a Government of India Khaliwarriors (talk) 14:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Khaliwarriors Wikipedia doesn't care about that. We care about what reliable independent sources say, eg this one. Governments are political and commonly defend organisations related to them. You are heading for a topic ban at thiss moment. Doug Weller talk 15:18, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. It is not appropriate to falsely report a user who you are having an edit war with. Please discuss or take to WP:ANEW instead of trying to report for vandalism. Red Phoenix ^talk 15:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2008 attacks on Christians in southern Karnataka shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 15:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bantwal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 19:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fighter-bomber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PAF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text to Sumdorong Chu from another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Can you please go to Talk:Sumdorong Chu and write a note stating where you copied the content from? Kautilya3 (talk) 19:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of military operations of India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cho La.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hudugaata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Komal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Insurgency in Balochistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Chittisinghpura massacre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Another warning for you not to remove well-sourced text from articles. — kashmīrī ^TALK 11:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in National Investigation Agency, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 20:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]