User talk:Khalidgaur

August 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sanjeev Nanda. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tito☸Dutta 04:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjeev Nanda

Do not move Sanjeev Nanda hit-and-run case article. See RM consensus at the talk page. --Tito☸Dutta 09:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sanjeev Nanda hit-and-run case, you may be blocked from editing. Tito☸Dutta 09:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at 1999 Delhi hit-and-run case‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —C.Fred (talk) 04:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Regarding this edit - just because you disagree with an article, please assume good faith and don't assume that they are vandalising. The article has not been deleted, as it is not an attack page; everything on the page has been properly referenced from 3rd party sources. If you disagree with the article, then I would suggest taking it to WP:AFD, or improving the article by adding to it. Stephen! ^Coming... 08:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Kuldeep Bishnoi, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:06, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --BallenaBlanca (Talk) 15:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Khalidgaur. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Nangia & CO LLP, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You appear to be promoting this business on behalf of repindia.com. You are required to disclose WP:PAID editing under the terms of use. Cabayi (talk) 12:38, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Nangia & CO LLP while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 22:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nangia & CO LLP

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Nangia & CO LLP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — MRD2014 ^Talk 12:37, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vikram Gandhi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vikram Gandhi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:46, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

18 October 2018

help me to improve this article, all mentioned citation links are very authentic and profile is very genuine.

Reminder

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Khalidgaur, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Khalidgaur|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:17, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Block

Why you guys threat everyone to block on Wikipedia? Show me where did you find its paid activity? Founder of Wikipedia (talk (talk

Maybe you should try Googling your username, to see why you were blocked. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:07, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing on Google about my name, all Wikipedia editors using fake identity what about them? I think. I should not waste my time here as this is completely biased platform.

Delhi Meetup !

Hello ! Greetings of the day ! A meetup plus onsite editing event is being planned in New Delhi, this Sunday. I request you to please attend the same. More details here -Abhinav619 (talk) 03:56, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Your message

Hello Abhinav619 (talk) When is other wikipedia meet up in Delhi. Contact please my email - mkgauri @ gmail dot com

Your draft article, Draft:Abhinav Kohli

Hello, Khalidgaur. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abhinav Kohli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 18:20, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]