User talk:Khaddy4

This is Khaddy4's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parbhis Rehan (January 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MarcGarver was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

MarcGarver (talk) 15:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oops, okay

I will improve it Khaddy4 (talk) 16:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khaddy4! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarcGarver (talk) 15:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khaddy4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why I was blocked, I don't use multiple accounts, I have only one account. kindly look into it, please. Looking forward to a response Khaddy4 (talk)

Decline reason:

Looking at your edits, this is probably a case of meat puppetry. You will have to go into detail about your editing and why you were editing the same topics as a blocked user. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khaddy4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia which anyone can edit any topic based on the Wikipedia policy and guidelines, right? So how will I know a topic to edit or not? How will I know whether a user who makes edits on a topic as I did is blocked or not? I am just making edits like a normal editor or contributor will do, why will I be attached to a user who makes edits on a topic as I did? Does it mean that administrators and other editors that improve a page/topic by making edits are attached to the users like you claimed I am? If I know a topic/user is having issues, why will I drag myself into it? I can never get involved with any of such. Kindly look into it, Thanks. Khaddy4 (talk) 10:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's no easy way to say this, but given your editing pattern, I struggle to believe that your answers to my queries below are entirely accurate. As such, I am declining this request. --Blablubbs (talk) 07:59, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So you are saying it is a pure coincidence that you went right to and edited the same topics as a blocked user? Out of the infinite number of topics to edit? I'm just wondering if that's what you're saying. 331dot (talk) 13:53, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no how I will know a topic to edit or not when it's not that there is sort of telepathy or stuff and also I don't know the so-claimed topic because I edited two topics in the past few days, Thanks. Khaddy4 (talk) 14:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I converted your second unblock request above into a comment. You may have only one unblock request open at a time.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop putting an issue that is not mine to me, I said I have only one account or what is this thing with your second account? If you don't want African and Nigerians to contribute to Wikipedia, just say so Khaddy4 (talk) 14:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you are African or Nigerian or from the planet Vulcan. Your race or nationality are not relevant whatever it might be. Please answer my question- are you claiming this is a coincidence? Please read about meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 17:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I said so because I have several editors that face this same issue from Nigeria here. Yes it's a coincidence and I have read Wikipedia:MEAT.

My question has not been answered, what is the so-claimed topic that caused this issue? Khaddy4 (talk) 18:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to 331dot's question, which you should answer, I have a question: what other accounts have you used on en.wiki besides Khaddy4?--Bbb23 (talk) 19:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None Khaddy4 (talk) 19:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Do I have a response? Is my account not going to be unblocked? because I don't understand you people Khaddy4 (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your request will be reviewed in due course. Admins are volunteers doing what they can when they can in their own time. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What they can when they can?? It is well Khaddy4 (talk) 09:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Khaddy4; a few questions for you:
- Have you ever operated any other accounts on the English Wikipedia?
- Have you ever edited the English Wikipedia in exchange for payment or reimbursement, disclosed or otherwise?
- Do you have any connection to – or conflict of interest with – Parbhis Rehan, or any other subject you have written about?
Thank you. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Blablubbs,

No I haven't operated any account other than this.

No I have never edited in exchange of anything

No I don't have connection with any of the subject I have written or edited on Wikipedia.

Thanks Khaddy4 (talk) 12:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
When am I going to be unblocked? Khaddy4 (talk) 03:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Khaddy4: Administrators, like all other users on Wikipedia, are volunteers who contribute when their time permits. You are just one of many users in a long backlog of requests for unblock. Therefore it may be several days, or even weeks, before your appeal is dealt with. You have to simply be patient and wait your turn. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is well Khaddy4 (talk) 14:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blablubbs I am not sorry to say this but if you feel offended, I apologize. Don't you think it stupidity to ask question when you know that you can't believe my answers as you said above, or do you want me to lie for you to believe me and satisfy yourself.

You said my editing pattern make you not to believe me, if an editor is editing in a wrong way or pattern, isn't it the administrator meant to correct it and explain the right way to edits on Wikipedia and if the pattern continue then you can be saying all this and how many edits have I made so far here that make you think I know the right editing patterns.

If you want to unblock the account, do so and if you are not, stop stressing me over something to that doesn't add to my income. Khaddy4 (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

stop stressing me over something to that doesn't add to my income. I don't understand what that means. What does your "income" have to do with Wikipedia?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:41, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what it means is that all this talk and arguing is stressing me out when it's not that I am getting paid for whatever I do here, I am just one of the volunteers from the community and you people are stressing out with what is not mine Khaddy4 (talk) 15:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Parbhis Rehan

Hello, Khaddy4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Parbhis Rehan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Parbhis Rehan

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Parbhis Rehan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Khaddy4. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]