User talk:KeymasterOne

This is KeymasterOne's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kananga (documentary) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Crunchydillpickle was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hey, thanks for the submission and welcome to Wikipedia! This draft only has three citations currently, and none are secondary sources. Articles are required to have a handful (think five or six minimum) of secondary sources, such as news articles. Check out WP:RSP for a guide to the best references. Let me know if you have any questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kananga (documentary) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 20:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion. I have edited the article and re-submitted it. KeymasterOne (talk) 17:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KeymasterOne! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 20:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kananga (documentary) (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kananga (documentary) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 04:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kananga (documentary) (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kananga (documentary) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 08:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shorban Empire (February 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An analogy

Maybe this will help? Think of it this way. Let's say your favourite colour is something called "clover green". Someone argues with you and says that their favourite colour is also "clover green" but it looks different than the colour you showed them. You talk to some people and they agree with you that you are right and the other person is wrong. Hypothetically, there are people who study different shades of colours and write about clover green. Both of the images you've been showing each other as the "true" colour are classified by said scholars as clover green. Now replace clover green with Christian and now maybe it's a bit easier to get it? I hope this doesn't come across as infantilizing, I was just hoping that maybe creating some distance from the topic at hand would help you see it from a new perspective. Sometimes that sort of approach can do wonders. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but my point is that since it is definitely disputed whether the LDS members are really Christians, could we add that to the front of the page? We could make it something along the lines of this (these new revisions might have errors as they are just drafts):

"The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, informally known as the LDS Church or Mormon Church, is a restorationist, nontrinitarian disputed Christian denomination that is the largest denomination in the Latter Day Saint movement."

Or this:

"The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, informally known as the LDS Church or Mormon Church, is a restorationist, nontrinitarian denomination, that is the largest denomination in the Latter Day Saint movement. It is agreed upon religious scholars that the LDS church follows Christianity, although this claim is disputed.". KeymasterOne (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with that is that adding the "disputed" part would place an undue emphasis on "disputed" and that would create a false balance. Theoretically, if you were able to find plentiful mainstream academic sources disputing the LDS church's classification as Christian and that's how you started a talk page discussion, consensus could change. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi KeymasterOne! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Ground Services moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Turkish Ground Services. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources need to be reliable and independent. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was/am going to add more info to it. Thanks! KeymasterOne (talk) 17:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Turkish Ground Services (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Turkish Ground Services and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Conflict of Nations: World War 3

Hello, KeymasterOne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Conflict of Nations: World War 3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Conflict of Nations: World War 3

Hello, KeymasterOne. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Conflict of Nations: World War 3".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Turkish Ground Services

Hello, KeymasterOne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Turkish Ground Services, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]