User talk:Keyhound

Other/previous account(s)?

please provide a comprehensive list of other accounts you have used for editing Wikipedia so far, or a credible explanation why not doing so is compatible with the policy against sockpuppetry, specifically the part about internal discussions.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I'm baffled by this Talk page post. I registered for a Wikipedia account solely to report sockpuppetry to a Wikipedia admin. I have made no edits to any pages. Please feel free to peruse my prior messages for further information. I do not use any other Wikipedia account or accounts.

Could you clarify why you posted this on the Talk page for my account, rather than investigating the reports I have filed? Is somebody retaliating against my reports of sockpuppetry by accusing me of the same? This seems little more than a distraction, as this perplexing inquiry has only come out after I reported that dozens of illicit sockpuppet accounts are connected to a Pornhub associate, and the sockpuppets' many edits are being protected by another Wikipedia user named tgeorgescu, controlling pages related to pornography. I also just today pointed out evidence that tgeorgescu and NeuroSex communicate outside of Wikipedia.

I do not use other accounts on Wikipedia. I don't really have anything further to say on the matter. If you can bring up any reasonable reason why you may suspect otherwise, I would be happy to clarify any of your specific concerns. But until then, please investigate the well-warranted concerns I brought up regarding pornography industry associates and supporters astroturfing pornography-related pages utilizing dozens of sockpuppet accounts.

Incidentally, are you aware that Tamzin (with the assistance of other admins) has already affirmed NeuroSex's extensive sockpuppetry? Keyhound (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keyhound: As WP:SPI notes, if you have evidence of sockpuppetry/conflict-of-interest editing by a Wikipedia administrator, you probably want to just send it in an email to the arbitration committee (<arbcom-en@wikimedia.org>). This way, the appropriate body can take a look at it and conduct an investigation. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk and ToBeFree: I've WP:DUCKed this account – I would normally understand that to be the obvious move in this case, but since you both seem to be playing this more cautiously (and know far more about this than I do), no objections to it being reversed. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 07:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I personally am fine with a block and surprised it didn't happen earlier. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked, with apologies

I've come into off-wiki evidence that suggests that you're not a sockpuppet, and have reversed your block. If you have evidence of NeuroSex sockpuppetry and other misconduct, I would suggest emailing the Arbitration Committee, as Tamzin is no longer an admin. take care :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 19:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for acknowledging that I am not, in fact, a sockpuppet. :) Apologies accepted.

Is there a link to precisely how and where to email the Arbitration Committee? I'm not a Wiki insider and I find the system very challenging. Thank you for any help you can offer. Keyhound (talk) 01:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) There are details on how to email the Arbitration Committee at User:Arbitration Committee & Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee § Contacting the Committee. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 01:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]