User talk:Keybladeofhearts

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Directors Guild of America Award for Outstanding Directing – Drama Series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Killing, Friday Night Lights and Game of Thrones

List of awards and nominations received by The Office (U.S. TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Craig Robinson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to 63rd Primetime Emmy Awards does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 01:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Directors Guild of America Awards 2011 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Michael Stevens and The Artist

Directors Guild of America Award for Outstanding Directing – Television Film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Stevens

Paul Feig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ski Patrol

Writers Guild of America Award for Best Screenplay – Episodic Drama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Peter Blake

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Pictures of Hollis Woods. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 04:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

Hi, you don't have to remove red links just because an article doesn't exist. Red links are perfectly valid when they refer to a article that may be created at some point in the future. As the page on red links says Good red links help Wikipedia—they encourage new contributors in useful directions, and remind us that Wikipedia is far from finished. NtheP (talk) 22:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Writers Guild of America Award for Best Screenplay - Episodic Comedy

I am fairly certain that you are not a vandal. However, you are misunderstanding Writers Guild of America Award for Best Screenplay - Episodic Comedy. Please do not remove the nominees. Please help fill them in like at Writers Guild of America Award for Best Screenplay – Episodic Drama.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:23, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not keep doing this we need to add nominees from earlier years and not remove them from the current one.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:36, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]