User talk:Kewtea

Hello, Kewtea, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! N4 (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bubzbeauty (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bubzbeauty.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for
your contributions
to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bubzbeauty

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bubzbeauty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bubzbeauty is not notable for the list

As you can see from the above talking about the rejection of the article for creation, the AFC talk says "This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia." In other words, she is not notable. As a general rule for the Youtube list, if the person is not notable enough for an article, the person is not notable enough for the list. After your attempts at creating the article anyway, it was nominated for speedy deletion for the fifth time (by someone who got to it before I finished the edit). Please read the above, the guidelines for notability and take heed at this which is plastered on the top of the edit page:

Attention!

Per the consensus reached in a March–April 2011 request for comment (permanent link):
Add only artists who have received significant coverage in one or more reliable sources (see Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists#Lists of people for details)
Do not add your own YouTube page or another person's videos for the purpose of advertising.
Do not add yourself or someone else just because they have a high amount of views and/or subscriptions.
Do not create an article for yourself and reference it here for means of advertising.
Any names added without a reliable third party reference will be removed!
Please keep the list in alphabetical order. Thanks.

For further details, please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources, Wikipedia:Notability (people) and Wikipedia:Notability (web).

Zero Serenity (talk) 21:08, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you as a user fall pretty obviously under Single Purpose Account since the only items you edit are completely related to this person you keep trying to inject into the Wiki. Pleading with Admins (or me for that matter) will not change her level of notability for you must establish it to us. Zero Serenity (talk) 21:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection request for Lindy Tsang

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Lindy Tsang requesting that it be protected against recreation. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our inclusion guidelines, please request a deletion review or use a request for unprotection instead.

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete it is considered disruptive and is grounds for blocking. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lindy Tsang (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lindy Tsang.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kewtea reported by User:Jackmcbarn (Result: ). Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at List of YouTube personalities

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at List of YouTube personalities. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report of this case is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kewtea reported by User:Jackmcbarn (Result: 24 hours). EdJohnston (talk) 14:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Kewtea

User:Kewtea, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kewtea and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Kewtea during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bubzbeauty (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bubzbeauty.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kewtea, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lindy Tsang

Hello Kewtea. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Lindy Tsang".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lindy Tsang}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]