User talk:Kevinado10

Speedy deletion nomination of Jallikattu Premier League

Hello Kevinado10,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jallikattu Premier League for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Jallikattu Premier League. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 08:53, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jallikattu Premier League

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jallikattu Premier League, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 12:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Jallikattu Premier League, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 14:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 15:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Kevinado10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20814 was submitted on Mar 08, 2018 20:03:03. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability, and Jallikattu Premier League

Hi there, at Wikipedia we don't just write about everything, we write about subjects that are notable. It is the article creator's responsibility to properly establish that a subject, like Jallikattu Premier League meets our notability guidelines. The relevant one here is is probably our General Notability Guideline, which states that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." The guideline further explains what constitutes "significant coverage" (i.e. not just passing mentions), etc. Currently the article fails to meet our general notability guideline, largely because you've added no references to reliable sources speak about this subject in depth. In order for this article to survive, you're going to have to demonstrate that this is a subject mainstream press cares about. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 11:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kevinado10. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 13:06, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]