User talk:Kevin.dubienski

Welcome!

Hello, Kevin.dubienski, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Donna Kennedy-Glans, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Donna Kennedy-Glans

A tag has been placed on Donna Kennedy-Glans, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevin.dubienski. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your article

The main problem with the article was that read as if it was promoting (a) Ms Kennedy-Glans and (b) her campaign. Wikipedia requires a neutral point of view and is specifically not for promotion of any kind - see also WP:NOBBLE. You mention a "potential nomination contest between Conservative parties" which makes me wonder whether you have political reasons for wanting an article. If so, you have a problem - the better the article is as a campaign document, the less likely it is to be acceptable.

If you are associated with Ms Kennedy-Glans or her campaign, read:

My advice would be to cut out most of the second part of the article. Just summarise who she is and what she has done, with less about her views. Mention her book, don't summarise it. The long section about the campaign is a problem - it makes the article look like a WP:COATRACK - a term for an article ostensibly about one subject but really designed to promote another. If the campaign is notable on its own right, then write a (neutral, not campaigning) article about it; but don't give it more than a few lines in Ms Kennedy-Glans' article.

I suggest you do a draft in your user-space at User:Kevin.dubienski#Donna Kennedy-Glans, and then post a request at WP:Requests for feedback to get other editors' views before moving it into the main encyclopedia.

A point of technique: if you put an asterisk in front of each of your list of references, they will appear in a neat column rather than a jumbled mess. The reference numbers in the main text look as though you meant them to be "in-line references", which is good, but see WP:CITE for how to do it properly. Briefly, you put the reference in the text at the appropriate point bracketed by <ref> and </ref>, and then at the end of the article put {{reflist}}, and it all formats itself. It's tricky, and you need to use "Show preview" a lot until you have got it right.

Also, when posting on talk pages, it is useful to end with four "tilde" characters ~~~~, which the system converts into a signature of your username and the time and date - like this: JohnCD (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback archived

Hello! A while ago, you requested some feedback for an article at Feedback forum. Because it has been up there a while, and you've received some at least useful responses, I have now archived the replies in Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/Archive/27. Please do not edit that page though; if you require further feedback, add a new request on WP:FEED.

If you want help with anything whilst using Wikipedia, you can either:

Use a {{helpme}} - please create a new section at the end of your own talk page, put {{helpme}}, and ask your question - remember to 'sign' your name by putting ~~~~ at the end; OR

Talk to other users who will be happy to help live, using this.

Chevy monte carlo 10:12, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]