User talk:Ketan patel (KP)

March 2018

Hello, I'm Lars.Dormans. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ketan Patel have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Lars.Dormans (talk) 07:23, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ketan Patel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 10:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Ketan Viramgama. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 12:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ketan Viramgama

Hello Ketan patel (KP),

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ketan Viramgama for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk 13:12, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ketan patel (KP)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Ketan patel (KP), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JW 1961^Talk 13:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ketan patel (KP) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

block is no longer necessary because I understand that why I get blocked , I assure you that I will not do it again and I will do a productive contributions instead thank you. Ketan patel (KP) (talk) 15:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please demonstrate your understanding by explaining specifically what you did wrong, how you will avoid doing it again, and you tell specifically what productive contributions you wish to make. As this request does not do these things, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 18:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ketan patel (KP) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that promotion and autobiography is strictly not acceptable in Wikipedia and that's why I get blocked, I assure you that I am not gonna do any promotion and autobiography again or anything afterwards, and I only contribute the authentic and valid article and info about Bollywood and gujarati film industry, so I request you to unblock my account, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketan patel (KP) (talk • contribs) 06:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. You've demonstrated you cannot edit neutrally about Bollywood and gujarati film industries. Yamla (talk) 10:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.