User talk:Keshetsven

Welcome!

Hello, Keshetsven, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Recognition of same-sex unions in Romania may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

ro/pls/proiecte/upl_pck.proiect?idp=17488&cam=1 Propunere legislativă privind parteneriatul civil (''Legislative proposal on the civil partnership'']</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not alt

I have taken the liberty of removing the {{publicuser}} tags you applied to user talk:Mr. Straub and User:Mr. Straub/hang14/. The publicuser tag is used to indicate that a user operates more than one account, ie. a different user name. As far as I know Mr. Straub has only one account - do you know different? User:Mr. Straub/hang14/ is simply a perfectly normal user subpage. I see no reason for any notice at the top of the page over and above the present "Back off!" notice. Do you agree? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 03:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, I guess the Right Honorable Gentleman was mistaken about Mr. Staub having multiple accounts. -- Keshetsven (talk) 01:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was mistaken but it is still the case that the tags you applied were totally inappropriate. User:Mr. Straub/hang14/ did not need a tag and the tag you applied to User talk:Mr. Straub did not state his other account. User:David Straub contains a perfectly acceptable declaration of his other account and the symmetrical message that I added at User:Mr. Straub#Personal account completes the declaration. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 02:13, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

on vandalism

In regards to your note on User:Biruitorul‎, please note that 'vandalism' in Wikipedia does not apply to content disputes. Wikipedia:Vandalism provides more detail. --Soman (talk) 03:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Siguranta

As a contributor to the English language Wikipedia, I consider it a matter of politeness to discuss any matters in English. Siguranta was created in 1908 as "Direcția Poliției și Siguranței Generale". Some decades later, apparently in 1924, the name indeed changed to "Serviciul Secret de Informații", only to be changed again in 1940. The communists, the main target of the Siguranta in the interwar period, made a point of not using "siguranta" or a derivative in the title of any secret service, choosing instead a synonym, "securitate" (for the English speakers, both words translate as "security"). A Google book search shows that the name "Siguranta" is commonly used by English language scholars to refer to the service throughout its existence (1908-1948).Anonimu (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citing a Google search is a big bluff and has no standing. Also, you should have known that regime change has nothing to do with a mare synonym; Siguranța Statului is indeed the commonly known name (and referred to) for the Romanian Secret Service during the interwar period. But you should also acknowledge that it hold different names during different periods of time. --Keshetsven (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not citing Google search, I'm just indicating a list of sources, most of which fit WP's definition of reliable sources. And Google Book Search has for a long time been used on WP as a raw indicator for scholarly usage of terms. And as you acknowledge yourself, "Siguranta" is the common name for the subject, and should therefore be used as the title of the article, per our naming policy. Furthermore, the various official names (both the English translation and the Romanian originals) are dully noted (and made bold) in the article's lead, informing the user about the name changes.Anonimu (talk) 17:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guccifer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canadian Institute of Diversity and Inclusion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Execution of Clayton Lockett, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Deterrent, The Telegraph and Humanity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Execution of Clayton Lockett may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

execution-deeply-troubling-obama-says.html?hpw&rref=us|accessdate=3 May 2014|newspaper=[[NY Times]|date=2 May 2014}}</ref> Obama cited uneven application of the death penalty in the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Barnevernet into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

The move was to Bodnariu case on 15 February 2016‎. This message is merely to inform you of the need for attribution. 220 of ^Borg 07:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Barnevernet

I have suggested to move Barnevernet to The Norwegian Child Welfare Services (because the latter is the official English name of the services, and this is English Wikipedia). Now I realised from the article's revision history that you have moved the article in the opposite direction some months ago. If you disagree in the move I have suggested, please explain your reasons on the article's talk page. Best wishes, Hanno (talk) 06:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bodnariu case for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bodnariu case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodnariu case until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hanno (talk) 19:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Keshetsven. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Keshetsven. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Keshetsven. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fdgr2008 logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fdgr2008 logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Canadian Institute of Diversity and Inclusion.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Canadian Institute of Diversity and Inclusion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Salvador Puig Antich-en.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Salvador Puig Antich-en.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 15:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]