User talk:Banjo92

KenjaAus, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi KenjaAus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello KenjaAus, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Kenja Communication have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Banjo92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

how do i change my username?

Decline reason:

Like it says in the message above, add the code {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} - but replace "new username" with the new username. A renamer will then change the name of the account for you. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock-un|benji|request change username KenjaAus (talk) 07:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)}[reply]

There's already an account with that name (Benji) registered, so please edit your request to choose a different one - you can use the "account availability check" link to check. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Banjo92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

banjo92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

i'll get this right eventually! thank you KenjaAus (talk) 23:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Renamed and unblocked, welcome back. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. DoABarrelRoll.dev(Chat!)(Contrib's)(Email)(???) 01:07, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DoABarrellRoll, it is actually more the other way around - user Dorothyette is literally undoing all my edits. I have only undone a couple back the other way. Would appreciate some assistance with this as I'm simply trying to correct the page but this user is making it impossible. Thanks. Banjo92 (talk) 01:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have given you both that message, so they know that they can be blocked for 3RR, that should be enough for now. Tell me if they revert again. Thanks,DoABarrelRoll.dev(Chat!)(Contrib's)(Email)(???) 01:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]