User talk:Keke Zoë

December 2019

Hello, I'm Geraldo Perez. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Isabela Moner, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:SydneySerena.png

Thanks for uploading File:SydneySerena.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:45, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Serena moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sydney Serena, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Sssniperwolf

An article you recently created, Sssniperwolf, has been nominated for deletion. For biographies of living people, Wikipedia requires articles be well-sourced and the sources to come from reliable books/websites/etc. The article lacks citations and I can't find anything really to add myself. The deletion discussion for your article is at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sssniperwolf}}. Thanks for editing, Hog Farm (talk) 14:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sssniperwolf has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sssniperwolf was changed by Keke Zoë (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898767 on 2019-12-07T06:41:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:41, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sydney Serena

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sydney Serena requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ... discospinster _talk 16:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Geez,sorry but I was trying to help sorry there's no source.I didn't mean to vandalize it.But it's true.If you so mean about you add a source yourself.😤 Keke Zoë (talk) 15:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kaia Gerber. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Sssniperwolf. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You need a source prior to changing someone's name. The cited source has "Lia", not the name you gave. It might be possible to source the name you gave (as another name), but you need a source saying this. Eostrix (talk) 14:15, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Faith Nkesti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faith Nkesti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith Nkesti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 14:04, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's called working hard.Whatever but I'll make one when she is more notable.Thank you.😠 Keke Zoë (talk) 11:51, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sydney Serena

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sydney Serena requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lopifalko (talk) 10:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok😈 let me say this you should create the page because I work so hard to find inforamtion about her.So just leave me alone . thanks for the "advice." Keke Zoë (talk) 11:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Keke Zoë: Hi. I'm sorry your article didn't work out. From my brief investigation, Sydney Serena doesn't appear to be notable enough for a Wikipedia article yet. Your article didn't include a single source so it couldn't remain in mainspace as it was—Wikipedia is very strict about sourcing for biographies of living people. I also searched the Web for any independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the her and couldn't find any, hence I nominated it for deletion rather than sending it to draft. In my experience, you shouldn't have to work hard to find information about a person if they're notable enough for an article, the information should be easy to find in independent reliable sources; if you're having difficulty finding information then that's a good sign they're not yet notable. -Lopifalko (talk) 11:47, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Zoë I can't help but say that Lopifalko is right as par Wikipedia policy on notability, so I came to inform you that there's a transitional wiki to Wikipedia for everyone especially Africans called Wikiafripedia or the free Afripedia that's operated by the Wikiafrimedia Foundation.
It was started in 2017 as Logosnegro by Godman when he realized that topics becomes notable in time and that people should be given the freedom to write about topics using primary sources and incubate it on the wiki; when it's matured to Wikipedia standards, it can then be moved to Wikipedia for greater visibility in SERP but in time to come, the move might not be necessary since Wikiafripedia may have attained a good visibility of it own.

For example: the SSSniper Wolf on Wikiafripedia, which was created in October 2019, is better than the one you created recently on Wikipedia.

And like Wikipedia, Wikiafripedia is also like a library, no ads and relied on donations for it existence and uses the same software as Wikipedia, it is also integrated with Wikimedia-Wikidata and Commons

It was purposely made to mirror Wikipedia so that Wikipedian wouldn't have to learn a new interface when s/he decides to also become an Afripedian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.112.58.21 (talk) 07:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi - I just deleted your article about Sydney Serena, and I note that it was not your first attempt to publish an article about her. You might want to take a look at FIRST, which gives advice on writing your first article, and also at these guidelines on notability. Any article you write needs to explain why your subject is notable (just being a YouTuber or having a lot of followers on Instagram is not sufficient), and you need to have some reliable, independent, secondary sources to support the information in your article. Please don't keep trying to create the article unless you can show that the subject is notable. Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 11:19, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SSSniperwolf for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SSSniperwolf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSSniperwolf until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galobtter (pingó mió) 22:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sydney Serena concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sydney Serena, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sydney Serena

Hello, Keke Zoë. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sydney Serena".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Jalen Folf (talk) 04:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sssniperwolf

Hello, Keke Zoë. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sssniperwolf".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 07:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is SSSniperwolf. Thank you. CityOfSilver 02:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]