User talk:Kdemkiw
oh hey girl
[edit]wikipedia is weird and kind of hard to useYoungblom.m (talk) 15:02, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi!
[edit]I'm just trying to figure out what I'm doing.Amadell (talk) 15:02, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Kdemkiw, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Kdemkiw! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 5 October 2015 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Kdemkiw, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please complete the student training, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Major Points:
- Under "Drugs with known mechanisms of actions," the subsection "Aspirin" reads as very specific while the "Antidepressants" section reads as more general. It might be helpful to define one or two of the drugs that fall under the "many antidepressant drugs" referenced.
- It might be worth including a sentence or two about the difference between mode of action and mechanism of action in the top section of the article. If the two are sometimes used interchangeably, a reader may have found this page by searching the other term. This way, you can clarify which the article is discussing and what the difference between the two are.
Minor Points:
- The first sentence under "Drugs with known mechanisms of actions" is a bit of a run-on. This could easily be divided into two sentences.
- Under "Drugs of unknown mechanisms of action," the phrase "despite the drug's having been in use for many years" can be reworded to "despite use of the drug for many years."
- Under "Lithium," "scientistspostualte" should be "scientists postulate."
Mandy573 (talk) 06:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Peer Review 2
[edit]There is a lot of solid information and encyclopedic style writing, so good job! The choice of drugs for known and unknown mechanism are pretty standard, however there must be more known and unknown mechanisms. I feel like the title implies that there is going to be a list of all known mechanisms, rather than just a few examples, so something clarifying this or changing the title would help. Also I'm surprised to see that some common terms such as SSRIs don't have functioning wikipedia links.The last sentence of Genetic Interaction Methods Section made me laugh but I think it needs to be corrected for use in wikipedia. More information should be added to the mechanism of antidepressants, as if I'm not mistaken they treat a range of anxiety and mental disorders in addition to depression. Lithium may also be used as an anti-psychotic in other diseases besides bipolar (like schizophrenia). The article may also benefit from using more references for information. The sections asking DO I NEED THIS? when expanded may contribute a lot to the overall article. There are no particular concerns about the writing style. It is clear, encyclopedic, and accessible. Nice!