User talk:Kchupp

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Nathan dean park article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Nathan dean complex. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please leave the cleanup tag on the article, to attract attention from other editors to help improve the article. Thank you and happy editing. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nathan dean complex, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Please clean up the article before removing the cleanup template again. Thank you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nathan dean complex, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing. Removing maintenance templates does not improve the article. Please improve the article FIRST. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 13:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nathan Dean Complex

The article Nathan Dean Complex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Suggest deleting under WP:DIRECTORY; local recreation facilities are not presumed inherently notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]