User talk:Kblfan

August 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Joe Ira Clark has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Joe Ira Clark was changed by Kblfan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874776 on 2014-08-21T21:48:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:48, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joshua Vescovi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joshua Vescovi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Angelo Michael (talk) 22:45, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kblfan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kblfan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance tags while the underlying problems are still there

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Joshua Vescovi. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joshua Vescovi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Vescovi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Vescovi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove AfD tags from articles

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:45, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:51, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for continually removing valid Article for deletion notices from pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — MusikAnimal ^talk 23:25, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've just blocked for a week for the same reason as the last block. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:30, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]