User talk:Kaylee Procter

Please note that the previous content of your user talk page has been moved to your user page, User:Kaylee Procter.

I don't know what version of Big Brother this content is about, but whatever it is, it should be placed somewhere other than your user talk page, which is intended for other Wikipedia editors to communicate with you. I hope this helps. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at List of Home and Away characters (2016).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. – JuneGloom07 Talk 14:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother 18 (UK). ThisIsDanny (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Celebrities (2017)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Celebrities (2017) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Boleyn (talk) 07:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Leaky Caldron 22:43, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING!

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Caitlyn Jenner, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. X4n6 (talk) 02:42, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T♦C 03:10, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kaylee Procter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't written anything bad I was only writing about my familyKaylee Procter (talk) 20:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not clear why you think that matters at all. Disruptive edits with no justification, so no reason to consider unblocking here. Yamla (talk) 21:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kaylee Procter (talk) 20:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse of multiple accounts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When your unblock request was declined by Yamla, you turned around and created Hearts1992 in order to get around the block and continue making the same disruptive edits, which is an abuse of multiple accounts. If you attempt this again you will likely be blocked indefinitely.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]