User talk:Kaykris

This is Kaykris's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evidence-based Anatomy (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Evidence-based Anatomy may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kaykris, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evidence-based Anatomy (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Huon was:

The content of this draft is just plain wrong. If the concept of evidence-based anatomy was founded in 2014, why did Yammine name his institution the center for Evidence-based Anatomy, Sports & Orthopedic Research in 2009? If "[t]he first published anatomical meta-analysis (MA) looked for the clinical prevalence of palmaris longus (PL) tendon in human forearms" in 2013, then what is this or this? If I can find multiple errors with a few minutes of trying to independently verify key claims, the entire draft will need to be checked in detail, and re-written to summarize what reliable third-party sources report about this field of study.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kaykris/sandbox/Evidence-based Anatomy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Huon (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evidence-based anatomy (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Huon's question about dates hasn't been addressed. The discrepancy in the date, and the elaborate clumsiness of the language, leads this reviewer to wonder whether this is some sort of Sokal prank. Please address these concerns, or it will be necessary to MFD this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evidence-based anatomy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:09, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Evidence-based anatomy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Evidence-based anatomy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:39, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Evidence-based anatomy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Evidence-based anatomy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evidence-based Anatomy (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

I can't even tell if it passes notability criteria in its current condition. Needs major work on formatting and referencing. But it just might be the basis for a good article. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evidence-based Anatomy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Evidence-based Anatomy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Evidence-based Anatomy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Evidence-based Anatomy

Hello, Kaykris. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Evidence-based Anatomy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]