Jump to content

User talk:Kavyansh.Singh/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4
July 20, 2020 — June 30, 2021

July 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Manmad Junction railway station has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:36, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shakuntala Devi. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 12:33, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chandrakant Devtale (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kavyansh.Singh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chandrakant Devtale (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
also, please replace the Indic script with an English translation, as this is the English wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

@Curb Safe Charmer: I have now added the English translation and also represented the text more presentably. Kindly Publish my page now. Link to my page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Chandrakant_Devtale)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chandrakant Devtale (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Zoozaz1 (talk) 20:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chandrakant Devtale has been accepted

Chandrakant Devtale, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Control copyright icon Hello Kavyansh.Singh! Your additions to Presidency of Ram Nath Kovind have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Presidency of Ram Nath Kovind

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Presidency of Ram Nath Kovind you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 20:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Presidency of Ram Nath Kovind

The article Presidency of Ram Nath Kovind you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Presidency of Ram Nath Kovind for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 14:41, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
I appreciate your hard work creating template for Manmohan Singh series. Good job. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣✅ 16:28, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Presidency of Ram Nath Kovind

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Presidency of Ram Nath Kovind has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:14, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist Thanks for your copy edit, As you have gone through the article, kindly let me know that does it complies with the criteria of a good article, or it needs more information to be added. Previous GA nomination was failed (Talk:Presidency of Ram Nath Kovind/GA1). Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 02:53, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, it certainly should not fail because of grammar or citation issues. If you have more relevant information, why would you not add it? It's impossible to know what the reviewers will want they vary tremendously. I'd renominate it and see what the reaction is. Twofingered Typist (talk) 11:27, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Improving lists

Your peer review comments on List of victories of Rudolf Berthold are much appreciated. Better still was your reference to Featured list criteria, a page I had not located through my own research. Thank you for this useful reference. It will aid me in improving any lists I create.Georgejdorner (talk) 13:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
A barnstar for you! Georgejdorner (talk) 13:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for George H. W. Bush 1992 presidential campaign

On 19 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George H. W. Bush 1992 presidential campaign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George H. W. Bush 1992 presidential campaign. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, George H. W. Bush 1992 presidential campaign), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jimmy Carter 1976 presidential campaign

Hello! Your submission of Jimmy Carter 1976 presidential campaign at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 18:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Are you good with the ALT3? 168 characters so hook length is still good. BusterD (talk) 09:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
@BusterD: Yes, definitely better than Alt 2. Also, you can link Gerald Ford piping it to " Republican incumbent", but it too goes fine. (And "anyone but Reagan" is a good slogan, though Ford won the nomination narrowly and lost the election narrowly!) Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:53, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

George H. W. Bush 1992 presidential campaign

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article George H. W. Bush 1992 presidential campaign has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Twofingered Typist, Thanks for your copy-edit. As you have read the article, would just like to request you to give your feedback regarding the article at it Peer Review page. Also, at which criteria is the article most likely to fail in GA review? Thank-you!
Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
@Kavyansh.Singh: Sorry, I am not a reviewer, I simply copy edit articles for the GOCE. I have no idea why it might fail a GA review except it won't be for the grammar. Best of luck moving forward. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Appreciate your comments, Thanks! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

{subst:uw-copying|Reaganomics|to=Ronald Reagan 1980 presidential campaign}} If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🇨🇦 (talk) 15:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Ronald Reagan's 1980 presidential campaign

Hi. I've had a go at copy-editing the article as per the GOCE request but stumbled immediately upon some issues in the lead. For someone not familiar with the vagaries of American politics, some things were not clear to me. I did my best to fix the co-presidency bit (which repeats verbatim further down in the article), but also there are a bit too many details (numbers) in the second para. I am hoping to read the rest of the article to gain better understanding. But this is something you might want to consider. An article lead should be sufficiently accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Another thing I stumbled upon is "a nationally televised speech from a fundraiser program". What does it mean? He was attending a fundraiser and made a speech from there, which was televised? This phrase appears both in the lead and the Preparing for a run sub-section. I did a quick search and found that it was a "recorded video"; the source also mentions how they capitalized on Reagan's acting skills and filmed him in a stately room with a big desk and wooden chair. I believe these details are very important for the article and should be included. Otherwise, impressive research! I'll keep reading and posting some further comments. Leoseliv (talk) 09:21, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Leoseliv:, thanks for your contribution to the article. I have edited that article and reduced/summarized the numeric details in the second paragraph of lead. On the issue of nationally televised speech, I took it from an newspaper (Source) which mentions "In a nationally televised speech, and at a fundraiser dinner at the New York Hilton, the former California Governor said......" , but I guess I had misunderstood it. It would be better to write just "nationally televised speech", as a video on C-SPAN says "during a paid nationally televised speech on Nov. 13 1979."(Source) I have also included the other details mentioned. It would surely be helpful to receive more comments and feedback!
Thankyou!
Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Ronald Reagan 1980 presidential campaign

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Ronald Reagan 1980 presidential campaign has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. You'll notice I changed the date formats so that they are consistent with the format used in the article's text. This makes the citation section look a lot neater, in my opinion.

Best of luck with the GAN when you get to it..

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: Thanks a lot for your help. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Electoral history of John Quincy Adams

On 22 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Electoral history of John Quincy Adams, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Quincy Adams was the only American president to be elected as a member of House of Representatives after leaving the presidency? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Electoral history of John Quincy Adams. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Electoral history of John Quincy Adams), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Ronald Reagan 1980 presidential campaign

On 27 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ronald Reagan 1980 presidential campaign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the slogan of Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, "Make America Great Again", was also used by Ronald Reagan in his 1980 presidential campaign (campaign button pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ronald Reagan 1980 presidential campaign. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ronald Reagan 1980 presidential campaign), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kavyansh.Singh/Archive_1&oldid=1069234875"