User talk:Katouski

Speedy deletion nomination of Bank BelVEB

Hello Katouski,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bank BelVEB for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 14:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Katouski. I noticed that an article you created Bank BelVEB has been nominated from speedy deletion, but that you have continued to work diligently on editing it. This happened because your first version of the article was not up to Wikipedia standards. In its present state, it could still use some citations (see WP:CS). I understand that you may have meant to do this in the future, and I hope this does not discourage you from editing Wikipedia in the future. Next time, try creating a draft of the article, so that when you are ready to go live with the finished product, it can be reviewed. For example, you could create the article at Draft:Bank BelVEB. This step may prevent you from running into the same problem in the future. —Hermionedidallthework (talk) 15:44, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bank BelVEB

Hello Katouski,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bank BelVEB for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 15:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Bank BelVEB, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ubiquity (talk) 15:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ermakova Nadezhda Andreevna

Just so you know, I think Ermakova Nadezhda Andreevna might be headed for the same direction as your last article. I highly recommend making WP:DRAFTS first! —Hermionedidallthework (talk) 15:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bank BelVEB

Hello Katouski,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bank BelVEB for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 16:11, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ermakova Nadezhda Andreevna

The article Ermakova Nadezhda Andreevna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The translated page itself can't prove notability as other Wikipedia sites have less page watchers and patrollers and are not that strict like English Wikipedia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Action Hero Shoot! 17:09, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Katouski, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Katouski! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bank BelVEB (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nz101 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bank BelVEB and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nz101^Userpage_Talkpage 09:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bank BelVEB concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bank BelVEB, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bank BelVEB

Hello, Katouski. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bank BelVEB".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]