User talk:Kate Hardin/sandbox
Peer Review
[edit]Hey Kate! This is a very well written article that remains neutral throughout. I have a few notes though still. 1) At the end of the "Shepard and Metzler" section, the sentence: "That is, the more an object has been rotated from the original, the longer it takes an individual to determine if the 2 images are of the same object or enantiomorphs (Sternberg 247)" shifts tense from the rest of the paragraph. 2) It is worth noting as well that picture examples of both experiments could be beneficial. 3) I would generally note that you should make sure you are citing using the citation tool rather than doing in-text citations. (This occurs throughout, but most notably at the end of the fMRI paragraph.) 4) Additionally, be aware of the use of "In general" in the fMRI paragraph as it slightly drifts from neutrality. 5) This sentence: "This increased brain activation is accompanied by longer times to complete the rotation task and higher error rates." is a bit confusing. Perhaps rephrase it a little? 6) Good job. :) AnnaCat2 (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)