User talk:Kasslert

Welcome

Hello, Kasslert, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 07:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Nomination of Monica Kulling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monica Kulling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Kulling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Antony Gibbons Grinling) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Antony Gibbons Grinling, Kasslert!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you expand this? It looks a bit empty.

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mobatime

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Kasslert, thanks for creating Mobatime!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article may be about a notable subject but to avoid deletion please provide multiple, independent WP:Reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Douglas Biow

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Kasslert, thanks for creating Douglas Biow!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. To avoid deletion please ensure that any cited sources display correctly. Please see WP:CITE

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your new pages

Hi. We appreciate what you are doing but please complete one article first before making more stubs. It's most unlikely that other people will pick these articles up and complete them for you and they will eventually be deleted. For help in creating articles please see: My first article and if you have any questions please ask them at The Tea House. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have created at least 34 pages at a very fast rate. Please note that simply using library lists to mass create very short biographies with very little useful content is not the way we work here. It is not useful to the encyclopedia and just creates works for others who patroll the new pages. Please stop now to prevent you editing privileges from possibly being restricted. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hal Bridges

Hi, I'm Zakhx150. Kasslert, thanks for creating Hal Bridges!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've added a couple of flags here. It would be very useful if you could link other pages to this one and change the bare url references here to meet the normal referencing style.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Zakhx150 (talk) 17:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The referencing issue is also true of your recent articles Melchiorre Sessa, Giovanni Tacuino, Antony Gibbons Grinling, Douglas Biow, Mobatime and probably others. Please try to use the normal WP:MOS when creating new articles. Ta. Zakhx150 (talk) 17:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Kasslert, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Jeremy Popkin have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations were also found in the articles APR Howatt and Gordon Rhea. Please don't add copyright material copied from other websites to this wiki. Everything you contribute needs to be written in your own words please. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Barry Asmus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Barry Asmus, Kasslert!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see if you can address the improvement tags

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ingo Althofer

The article Ingo Althofer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ACADEMIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —usernamekiran(talk) 04:37, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (M. Jane Johansson) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating M. Jane Johansson, Kasslert!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are the same issues for Nuria Roca, Michael Mastanduno, Arthur Frank Wertheim, James A. Ramage, Philippe Margotin, Russell S. Bonds, Brad Butkovich, William L. Shea, Josiah Kaplan, Britt McCarley, Scott Zesch, Harry Pfanz, Leonard L. Richards, Arthur Kroeber, Torsten Cumberland Jacobsen, Zhexian Wan, Laura Ackerman Smoller, Earl J. Hess - all of the articles you've created. You are also not responding to talk page messages or improving your creations after issues have been raised. If this continues, you are likely to be blocked, which is a real shame. Please just slow down! We need new, dedicated editors, but you're creating a lot of problems at the moment. I hope you listen to the advice, stay around and work on some great articles. Boleyn (talk)

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James A. Ramage

The article James A. Ramage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Refs do not establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SamanthaB55 (talk) 14:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

=

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenneth E. Hall

The article Kenneth E. Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

DOes not meet WP:PROF, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 14:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Josiah Kaplan

The article Josiah Kaplan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:PROF, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 14:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down

A week ago, Kudpung advised you to slow down, and create fewer, better articles. You appear to have ignored his advice.

Take a look at Henry B. Fried, one of your many rapidly-created articles. The references are unreadable, and unformatted: this will lead to WP:Link rot. There are no links in the article, and it's not linked to from any other article. To make these into real articles, other editors will need to clean them up. Please, slow down. Your contributions are welcome, but it's not a race. Thank you. Uncle Roy (talk) 16:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vincent Virga

The article Vincent Virga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:PROD, WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William A. Frassanito

The article William A. Frassanito has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable. Lacks WP:RS to show that his books are notable - goodreads is not a reliable source

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]