User talk:Kaspo

Bot

The bot was unblocked by User:SQL, so you will be able to carry out the trial now. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 17:45, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

phpwikibot

Hey Kaspo - I've been redoing some of the phpwikibot code. I'm happy to share my revisions, but I'm not a big SVN user (plus I don't know if you'd want me editing the code directly anyway). do you want me to send it to you, or are you willing to give me a quick svn tutorial? --Ludwigs2 02:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:21, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2010s (U.S.) has been renominated for deletion

Dear Kaspo, I just wanted to let you know that an AfD, in which you participated in during October 2011, has been reopened for discussion. Please express your opinion again in the current discussion. Thank you. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 03:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2010s (U.S.) and several other articles in this series have been renominated for deletion

Dear Kaspo, I just wanted to let you know that an AfD, in which you participated in recently has been reopened. Please express your opinion again in the current AfD. Thank you. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 00:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion over the article List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2010s (U.S.)

Dear Kaspo. I just wanted to let you know that a merge discussion is currently taking place regarding the content of this article (as you probably remember, you participated in an AfD held over this article in the past) and the content of the rest of the U.S. number-one by-decade series of articles.

Please express your opinion on this matter in the current discussion. Thank you. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 21:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Montecatini Terme

Hello. Your request at WP:PNT was removed because that page isn't for suggesting expansion of existing articles from other language Wikipedias. The way to do that is explained at WP:TRANSLATETOHERE (and I now see that that's already been done). Regards, Largoplazo (talk) 17:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Italy#Template:WikiProject Italy

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Italy#Template:WikiProject Italy. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 19:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pharmanutra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pharmanutra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 21:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination (brand) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nomination (brand). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:36, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nomination (brand)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nomination (brand), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nomination (brand) (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nomination (brand) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kaspo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, Kaspo. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. A page you created Draft:Nomination (brand) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I used only third sources, I don't understand because a company with a lot articles in nazional newspapers is not in Wikipedia criteria. Kaspo (talk) 18:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If memory serves the content was of a promotional tone. And that's why it had to be deleted -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welp, I see @Rosguill: reviewed it a month ago and saw it as promotional. I looked at it again and agree with my first assessment. Please reread the linked information in the block notice I left, particularly the information about pitfalls to avoid. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill:@Deepfriedokra: I'm going to edit again I'm going to write it again with less promotional tones. you could restore the draft, please. So i can recover the sources I had already collected. However, the article is worthy of en.wiki because it is an eponym --Kaspo (talk) 22:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have emailed the WIkitext. Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:03, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but I had an old email. I have just changed it. Could you please resend it? Kaspo (talk) 08:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:09, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]