User talk:Kashagama

Welcome!

Hello, Kashagama, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Chooserr

Shenzi (people)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Shenzi (people), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ezeu 23:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Candace of Ethiopia

A tag has been placed on Candace of Ethiopia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gary King (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of African Chess

A tag has been placed on African Chess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Anshuk (talk) 07:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Dan Kashagama has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Alexfusco⁵ 21:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

African Chess

The page you created, African Chess, does not have any references, and may fail WP:V, wikipedia's verifiability policy. In addition, at least one of the claims ("Chess in Africa predates chess in other parts of the world") is simply incorrect. See the discussion at Talk:African Chess, and maybe you can improve the article by adding some references. Quale (talk) 19:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Africa-related articles

Hello, Kashagama. I notice you have made quite a lot of edits to Africa-related articles such as Senterej, Nile, Kandake and Amanirenas. When you are doing so, please ensure that you are familiar with WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:COI, WP:CITE and other relevant Wikipedia policies. Thanks.

This is the appropriate template message;

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Tameamseo (talk) 18:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. It makes it easier for others to see what you are doing and makes misunderstandings less likely Tameamseo (talk) 23:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eit to Twenty-fifth Dynasty

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Twenty-fifth dynasty of Egypt. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Possibly you had a reason, but unexplained removals of templates do not appear constructive Tameamseo (talk) 23:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kashagama01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kashagama01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Kashagama! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 202 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Caroline Kamau - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Charles Wachira - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caroline Kamau

The article Caroline Kamau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find sources that are not mirrors of wikipedia. I'm not convinced the AUF is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Banana (talk) 02:40, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Film and Television Association

The article African Film and Television Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Tagged for 18 months. No reliable sources. Orphan.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~KvnG 23:19, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kenya Peace and Solidarity Committee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenya Peace and Solidarity Committee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenya Peace and Solidarity Committee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles Wachira

The article Charles Wachira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journalist. It's a BLP with no sources about his history (just a link to a relatively current article of his).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]