User talk:Karljjung

Welcome!

Hello, Karljjung, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as God Save Me Foundation, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of God Save Me Foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on God Save Me Foundation, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Karljjung. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article God Save Me Foundation, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your email

Hi. On Wikipedia, we normally only use the email facility for things that are best kept confidential, such as investigations that are not out in the open yet and similar things. Ordinary communications go on talk pages like this. OK. Your suggested article would not be suitable, and I think you are misunderstanding Wikipedia. This is an encyclopaedia, not social media or free webspace. To have an article here, notability has to be shown for the subject - in this case either WP:GROUP or WP:CORP. The notability has to be backed up by reliable independent sources WP:RS. This means not own sites, social media, forums, wordpress or blogspot pages, directory entries, wikis or mentions in pieces written about other groups. I can only see 32 hits on Google, and the only one usually regarded as a reliable source (the Huffington Post) doesn't even mention the Foundation - it's an article about Pope Francis in the USA. Virtually all the hits are godsaveme own pages. As things stand, you don't stand a chance of getting an article. Sorry, but that's how it is. Peridon (talk) 11:25, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]