User talk:Karkafs Desiderium/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurds in Caucasia (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kurds in Caucasia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kurds in Caucasia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kurds in Caucasia. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 22:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mao Enpu (March 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Feel free to add to the Mao Yichang article, but this person does not warrant their own artiicle.

Qcne (talk) 16:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karkafs Desiderium! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 16:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

←== Your submission at Articles for creation: Caucasian Kurds has been accepted ==

Caucasian Kurds, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 22:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mao's depiction over Tiananmen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mao's depiction over Tiananmen. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 00:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Portraits overlooking Tiananmen has been accepted

Portraits overlooking Tiananmen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 06:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Srochik Castle

Hello, Karkafs Desiderium,

Thank you for creating Srochik Castle.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Can you try to add more information on the topic?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TheNuggeteer}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Karkafs Desiderium! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mount Ararat. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You introduced this content in your edit on 16 June. Ever since then, it has been disputed. If Mount Ararat is in another territory apart from Turkey, it would not be hard to find a source in support of it. Unless you do so, I'd advise you not to re-introduce it. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"You introduced this content in your edit on 16 June. Ever since then, it has been disputed."

This is correct, but you missed a few facts about this, what you missed is who disputes my edit.

My edit from the 16th was undone on the 21st by "188.119.21.22". I then re-intoduced it but it was again undone, this time by "188.119.21.14". The article was then reverted to my edited version not by myself but by user "Vsmith". "188.119.21.14" then undid it again.

I hope this goes to show the problem with my edit, it has been again and again undone, not by actual users but by non-editors (real editors have insted accepted my edit and even reverted back to it).

I also want to mention that these non-editors I named have edited only on the Ararat article and have only removed my edit.

The Ip adresses are also weirdly simmilar... I hope my implication is clear.

My edit from the 16th has only been undone by non-editors (and you, but thats for a different reason).

I politely ask you to re-intoduce my edit if you understand the problem at hand, if you still disagree just say so, I wont edit that page until you and I are on the same page. Karkafs Desiderium (talk) 22:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All right. Actually, I was wrong about you introducing the edit on 16 June, since I noticed that you introduced the edit earlier on 22 May, and a version of it on 25 April. Either way, you lacked consensus in all instances. Actually, IPs are editors and their contributions count too. You should read WP:IPHUMAN about this. IPs can change too. Anyway, I did not only revert you because you lack consensus, but also because the content you seek to add lacks sourcing. If content was not before in an article, then there must be a reason for it. Mount Ararat is also a good article, so one needs to be more wary when editing it. Information needs to stay accurate and verifiable. StephenMacky1 (talk) 23:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I find sources I am allowed to edit on Ararat's article, right? Karkafs Desiderium (talk) 23:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You misunderstood, I called these IPs non-editors because they have only edited on one article, "real editors" in my words are people who regularly edit on wikipedia.

But that wasnt my point anyway, it was about these IPs having almost the same IP and only haveing edited once to revert an edit about Kurdistan. Karkafs Desiderium (talk) 00:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mount Ararat. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CodeTalker (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Karkafs_Desiderium reported by User:Aintabli (Result: ). Thank you. Aintabli (talk) 07:52, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]