User talk:Karenwalgraeve

Welcome!

Hello, Karenwalgraeve, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Centre of Evidence-Based Practice, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Blackguard 07:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Centre of Evidence-Based Practice

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Centre of Evidence-Based Practice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.rodekruis.be/en/who-are-we/research/centre-for-evidence-based-practice/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blackguard 07:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Belgian Red Cross-Flanders Transfusion Research Center

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Belgian Red Cross-Flanders Transfusion Research Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JMHamo (talk) 08:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belgian Red Cross-Flanders - Transfusion Research Center (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are no references at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Belgian Red Cross-Flanders - Transfusion Research Center and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Karenwalgraeve, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Centre of Evidence-Based Practice

Copyright permission has been received, so I have restored the page to Draft:Centre of Evidence-Based Practice where you can work on it. It is not ready for the main encyclopedia: simply copying an organization's own material does not make a satisfactory encyclopedia article, because an encyclopedia is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves. Its job is to summarise what reliable sources have said about a subject. I have this conversation so often that I have written User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard to explain the background.

The most important thing the article needs is references showing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements, about the centre, not just about the subjects it is interested in, to establish Wikipedia:Notability. That is, intentionally, a high bar, and many worthy organizations cannot pass it. That is not at all to their discredit, but means that they are not suitable subjects for an encyclopedia.

If you are connected with the centre, please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and note that you need to declare your interest. The COI rules apply to all subjects, not just to commercial firms.

There is good advice at WP:your first article. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS pending tag

Hi Karenwalgraeve, I have commented out an {{OTRS pending}} tag on your talk page. These tags need to be placed on the file page or article talk page (including the talk page of draft articles) - NOT on your talk page. If there is a deleted item for which permission has been submitted to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, you can ask at WP:OTRSN for someone to look for the email and restore the article if they can find it. --B (talk) 01:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Belgian Red Cross-Flanders - Transfusion Research Center

Hello, Karenwalgraeve. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Belgian Red Cross-Flanders - Transfusion Research Center".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 15:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Centre of Evidence-Based Practice

Hello, Karenwalgraeve. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Centre of Evidence-Based Practice".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 16:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]