User talk:Karachibro

Welcome!

Hello, Karachibro, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 10:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overlink

Hi, welcome to wikipedia. Please be advised of WP:OVERLINK and revert edits where you did this. In some cases you linked to things like spam or sarcasm. Please review that policy and revert your edits that didnt comply with it. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 09:26, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. A useful edit summary tells other editors why made the edit. If you have a good reason for removing wikilinks, for example, put that reason in the edit summary. Schazjmd (talk) 20:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Unnecessary" is not a reason to remove a wikilink. I've reverted your last two edits because both appear to be useful for readers. Schazjmd (talk) 20:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

I've reverted several of your recent grammatical changes to articles, and I suspect that English is not your first language. Please only make these sorts of edits if you are very certain the words you are changing are correct. Thanks for your cooperation. Magnolia677 (talk) 06:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm TubularWorld. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Brian Wilson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TubularWorld (talk) 09:46, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Esa Skyttä. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TubularWorld (talk) 09:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Assad Murtaza Gilani. Jevansen (talk) 20:48, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karachibro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello admin. I had received warnings regarding disruptive editing like revertimg reasonable edits of someone and I acknowledged my mistake and I started putting valuable information in articles I know about, as well as adding necessary hyperlinks. At this point, I really need to know what I did wrong again since I'm sure I didn't do any unreasonable edit afterwards. I understand that it is sensitive issue and editors should follow the guidelines. All I want from you is to get my account unblocked as a gesture of forgiveness, and I would highly appreciate if you also guide me how should I go further to become a good editor. I didnt have ill intentions to make mess and it is my mistake that I unabashedly kept making senseless edits. Looking forward for a positive response, thank you.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry and block evasion; this is now a CheckUser block. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Karachibro (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]