User talk:Kapanol420

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kapanol420 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unfair permaban, I hope and request the admin who banned me gets removed of his/her admin privilege Kapanol420 (talk) 16:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your behaviour here is horrific. There's no chance your block will be lifted any time in the foreseeable future. Go troll someplace else. Yamla (talk) 17:08, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've revoked your ability to edit this talk page. Guidance on the options available to you now is at WP:GAB. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:15, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #73669

was closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #73781

is open. If sufficiently convincing, and free of further outbursts, I'd like to restore talk page acess. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:55, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. I have restored the user's talk page access. They must address the various problems that lead to their block and specifically must address their threat to rape and murder. For the record, I very strongly oppose unblocking this user and believe there's no meaningful chance they'll convince anyone else, but their UTRS request was calm enough to justify one single additional unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 21:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:23, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I strongly oppose unblocking this editor. // Timothy :: talk 21:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thanks for the reminder. User was CTOP alerted for Eastern Europe. I feel a WP:TBAN from that area, as an unblock condition or as a DS thing, might be a good idea. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC) >[reply]
Thank you a lot Deepfriedokra! Yamla (talk) 10:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not good at editing or replying so I want to say that I don't know how to address my threats other than saying I am truly sorry and will apologize to the persons that I said that and I will never say any other bad/hateful comment again and will contribute positively to Wikipedia, I am open to anything like a probation period or anything, thank you a lot! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapanol420 (talk • contribs)

Thank you Yamla very much as well and I would like to apologize and say that I am extremely sorry to TimothyBlue and GirthSummit for my previous brainless messages that I directed towards them... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapanol420 (talk • contribs)

Please sign your posts in the future. You do so using ~~~~. --Yamla (talk) 10:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you I will do so in the future! Kapanol420 (talk) 10:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget StarMississippi -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I apologize to StarMississippi as well! Kapanol420 (talk) 15:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any chance for it to be transformed into a temporary ban, under supervision/probation period or anything will do instead of permanent, and I can prove that I changed and I won't use one bad word or engage in any flame war/vandalism when I will be unbanned, thank you for considering! Kapanol420 (talk) 15:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Please post your unblock request at the bottom of your user talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

{{unblock|reason= I wouldn't engage in any vandalism or disruptive behavior again and I will contribute with anything I can, starting with maybe missing letters or a missing comma or a dot, as I contributed with these kinds of things since the time I made my account while randomly browsing all sorts of articles because I am everyday on Wikipedia, and again I want to state that I am genuinely sorry for what I said and apologize to everybody that I hurt and hope they can forgive me even though I don't deserve it, thank you!  ~~~~}}.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Kapanol420 it should be absolutely clear I want nothing to do with you after your previous comments (that includes replying to me here).

If there is a consensus to replace the current block with a TBAN from Eastern Europe, I withdraw my above objection. // Timothy :: talk 21:36, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok and I understand that because I wrote some very brainless stuff and I apologize for it now that I understood and I am open to change and show that I won't write even one bad word from now on, neither in editing neither personally to nobody, so again I want to say that I am extremely sorry and please excuse me for my behavior... Kapanol420 (talk) 06:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I won't even edit any Eastern European articles again, I remember it was about Moldova where it all started, the language got officially changed in Constitution and in every law to Romanian and that's what I wanted for it to be and remain on the article because Moldovan doesn't exist anymore cause it's literally Romanian, anyways I won't get into it again... Kapanol420 (talk) 06:51, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's great as far as it goes, but how would you handle an WP:content dispute in the future? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would handle it the exactly way it's stated in the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution#Resolving_content_disputes Kapanol420 (talk) 15:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what do you guys say, up to offer me a chance? Kapanol420 (talk) Kapanol420 (talk) 09:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please properly use an unblock ticket to seek review of your unblock request by the unblock review team.

{{unblock|reason=FILL IN HERE ~~~~}}.

It looks like a malformed unblock request above Timothy's comment. You've requested unblocking before, you should know what it looks like when you do it right. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kapanol420 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood that I hurt people with my bad words and I promise I won't engage into hate speech or edit wars again Kapanol420 (talk) 09:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

I have re-removed talk page access. This doesn't come close to fully addressing your hate speech, nor does it mention a topic ban (though, in all fairness, you do mention this above). The reviewing admin is free to reinstate your talk page access if they have questions for you. --Yamla (talk) 10:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]