User talk:Kaltionis

Kaltionis, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kaltionis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Kaltionis! Thank you for your contributions. I am VQuakr and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! VQuakr (talk) 01:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HIV Denialism

Again, welcome! My reply on the article talk page was terse, but I would like to provide a little more explanation here. In your third edit summary you cited WP:DONTREVERT, which links to an essay. Another essay is WP:STATUSQUO - these two essays provide conflicting viewpoints shared by more than one editor, but neither is a "rule". WP:BRD is another explanation of an editing norm here: in short once your edit is reverted you should take that as a signal to discuss rather than to repeat the edit. In particular, arguing through edit summaries is generally unproductive.

Finally, arguing the meta-content about whether a revert was proper isn't a great use of the article talk page; there it is most productive to focus on content, not behavior or editors.

Thanks for your consideration, and one more time: welcome! VQuakr (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warm welcome, VQuakr! I am still new to Wikipedia since I joined several days ago, so I am yet to brush up on all of the community guidelines. I just wanted to clarify that the belief HIV doesn't cause AIDS is wrong and incorrect, especially because it goes against every scientific study, research, and analyses published on this subject. I apologize if I unwittingly caused damage to the article. Kaltionis (talk) 01:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. Wikipedia is hard to break, and even experienced admins sometimes make memorable mistakes without it being (seriously) held against them. VQuakr (talk) 01:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]