Jump to content

User talk:Kalapala0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Notice

The article Karuchola Vijay Kumar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karuchola Vijay Kumar moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Karuchola Vijay Kumar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mooonswimmer 00:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mooonswimmer bro then how to publish it Kalapala0 (talk) 00:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, Kumar is clearly non-notable. The article will not pass AfC. I would recommend requesting speedy deletion of the draft and contributing to other articles related to Indian politics, if that's what you're interested in. Mooonswimmer 00:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mooonswimmer i need to write about it give me tips how to write again on same Kalapala0 (talk) 00:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karuchola Vijay Kumar (January 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 01:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kalapala0! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karuchola Vijay Kumar (January 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:24, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Karuchola Vijay Kumar, you may be blocked from editing. Resubmitting a draft within a few minutes after it is declined, without addressing the comments of the reviewers, and without discussing with the reviewers or other editors, is insulting to the reviewers and is disruptive. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karuchola vijay kumar (January 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:39, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karuchola vijay kumar (January 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LordVoldemort728 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 14:37, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karuchola Vijay Kumar for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karuchola Vijay Kumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karuchola Vijay Kumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone what is issue for deletion Kalapala0 (talk) 08:51, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karuchola Vijay Kumar Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karuchola vijay kumar moved to draftspace

[edit]

Information icon An article you recently created, Karuchola vijay kumar, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 01:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karuchola vijay kumar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karuchola Vijay Kumar. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Silikonz💬 01:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Silikonz what is there in it too delete the page everything is good and everything is proper only know why u people wantedly do it on the article every time Kalapala0 (talk) 01:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, కారుచోల విజయ్ కుమార్. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Karuchola vijay kumar. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Karuchola vijay kumar. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 07:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karuchola vijay kumar moved to draftspace

[edit]

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Karuchola vijay kumar, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 07:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karuchola Vijay Kumar (February 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 09:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]