User talk:KaisermanZA

Welcome!

Hello, KaisermanZA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as James Barfield, 12th Baronet of Linlithgow, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fæ (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Barfield, 12th Baronet of Linlithgow

The article James Barfield, 12th Baronet of Linlithgow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a baronet is not, of itself notable. The article appears to fail the WP:BIO guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fæ (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Barfield, 12th Baronet of Linlithgow for deletion

The article James Barfield, 12th Baronet of Linlithgow is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Barfield, 12th Baronet of Linlithgow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fæ (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

James Barfield, 12th Baronet of Linlithgow

You really need to find some reliable sources to verify the information you have been adding here and at Hope Baronets. Why is it that Google Books and Google Scholar return no relevant hits for the search terms Barfield Linlithgow or Barfield Kirkliston? Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 21:44, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be discouraged if this one gets deleted; but check out:

The fundamental policy Verifiability, which includes: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true."
The inclusion criterion of Notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and press releases. More detail at WP:Notability (people). Note that notability is not inherited - being related to someone notable does not make a person notable.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:15, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]