User talk:Kagundu/Archives/2012/September
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Kagundu. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Request for Help (last)
Greetings Mr Stephenwanjau,
Could you kindly help me translate these passages into the brilliant and superb Kikuyu language? Please.
- "The Holy Communion is the sacrament to commemorate the death of the Lord Jesus Christ. It enables us to partake of the flesh and blood of our Lord and to be in communion with Him so that we can have eternal life and be raised on the Last Day. This sacrament should be held as often as possible. Only one unleavened bread and grape juice is used".
- "The Sabbath day, the seventh day of the week (Saturday), is a Holy Day, blessed and sanctified by God. It is to be observed under the Lord's grace for the commemoration of God's creation and salvation and with the hope of eternal rest in the life to come".
- "The church of jesus, established by our Lord Jesus Christ, through the Holy Spirit during the time of the 'latter rain', is the restored true church of the Apostolic time".
- "The Second Coming of Jesus will take place on the Last Day when He descends from heaven to judge the world: the righteous will receive eternal life, while the wicked will be eternally condemned".
Your help would be very Gratefully Appreciated, Thankyou very much. --Jose77 (talk) 07:18, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
List of Statutes of New Zealand 1840 – 1890
Please see my comments re your reversion of my edits on on the talk page of List of Statutes of New Zealand (1840–1890).
- I was using a semi automated software to check on edits being done on pages randomly.I have visited the page on List of Statutes of New Zealand (1840–1890) and to speak the truth I cannot make out what is in the content of that article. It could be for the fact that I am not a lawyer or I do not understand the New Zealand statutes or just my ignorance:). I am sorry for having mistakenly reverted your edits. I have assumed good faith and reverted the article back to the last revision. Once again, am sorry and I hope my apologies are accepted. ₫ӓ₩₳ Talk to Me. Email Me. 16:20, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- Well I am not a lawyer either, but can understand in general that it is a list by year of statutes. Though This first of the series is rather large compared with the later ones, and the creator(s) seem to have some odd paragraphing ideas! OK re apology, but I don't entirely understand the way the template for the series apparently work, so I left some of the headings in but "dummied" out. Hugo999 (talk) 21:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- Cheers, Riley Huntley talk 23:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 September 2012
- Technology report: Time for a MediaWiki Foundation?
- Featured content: Wikipedia's Seven Days of Terror
"Good Faith" revert
Hi Stephen,
I am interested to know why you reverted my edits to the Brocious page? The information is straight from the references linked and relevant to the incident? (I do apologize, I did not notice that I was not logged in at the time).
According to the guidelines we should assume good faith. Although the comments may not reflect well on Brocious they are never the less important for the public good. If hackers in general follow the accepted protocol of disclosing hacks to affected parties before making them public the world would be a safer/better place. It is thus in the interest of everyone reading about the vulnerability to also take not of the correct protocol when dealing with these matters.
You will note that almost all articles regarding the incident also contain this information for these reasons.
Would you suggest that we also remove the Genocide form the Adolf Hitler page because of how it reflects on his character ?
Cobus
The Signpost: 10 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost adapts as news consumption changes
- Featured content: Not a "Gangsta's Paradise", but still rappin'
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fungi
- Special report: Two Wikipedians set to face jury trial
- Technology report: Mmmm, milkshake...
- Discussion report: Closing Wikiquette; Image Filter; Education Program and Momento extensions
This Month in GLAM: August 2012
|
Your Credo account access has been sent to your email!
All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.
- If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
- If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:39, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You may want to respond to the questions. Mysterytrey 00:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Replied at the requests page - ₫ӓ₩₳ Talk to Me. Email Me. 06:23, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
The article KENCOM House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable commercial building. Fails WP:GNG.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolphin (t) 06:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Mombasa
Hi Stephen, I've been working on the Mombasa article. My goal is to get it up to good article status, but I could use some help. Would you be interested in working on it with me? Much obliged, Van Gulik (talk) 18:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- I would be glad to help to the extent I can. ₫ӓ₩₳ Talk to Me. Email Me. 19
- 25, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. Which sections would you like to improve? Van Gulik (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost expands to Facebook
- WikiProject report: Action! — The Indian Cinema Task Force
- Featured content: Go into the light
- Technology report: Future-proofing: HTML5 and IPv6
Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
- Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
- Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
- Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
- You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
- Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
- Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:14, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Deletion
Hi Stephen, I was actually in the middle of editing the article. Thanks for the heads-up though. Regards, John. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Otirumpel (talk • contribs) 06:26, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 September 2012
- In the media: Editor's response to Roth draws internet attention
- Recent research: "Rise and decline" of Wikipedia participation, new literature overviews, a look back at WikiSym 2012
- WikiProject report: 01010010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 01101001 01100011 01110011
- News and notes: UK chapter rocked by Gibraltar scandal
- Technology report: Signpost investigation: code review times
- Featured content: Dead as...
- Discussion report: Image filter; HotCat; Syntax highlighting; and more
Unconstructive
What is your definition of constructive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.10.107.82 (talk) 02:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- My definition of constructive is a deed on Wikipedia that improves the quality of work on Wikipedia.However, the deed must adhere to the Wikipedia policies and guidelines. For instance you did not provide sources for the information that you added to the biography of William Ruto and Martha Karua.Consider checking out WP:BLP and WP:RELIABLE SOURCES. Hope that helps. Talk to Me. Email Me. 03:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)