Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pending changes reviewer

I would like to put my hat in the ring again for this tool. I am aware of vandalism is and have familiarity with BLP policies. I try to avoid being trigger-happy, and usually err on the good side of AGF, so I tend to just leave things I'm not too familiar with alone for other editors to review.

Note: I made my previous request at the same time as requesting rollback. The rollback was declined by User:Fastily due to my recent return from a Wikibreak and failing to leave warnings for my first few edits. I disagree that reasoning carries across to reviewing pending changes, where the bar is to "filter out obvious inappropriate edits and vandalism" in "clear-cut cases". I ask that a new administrator considers this request on its own merits. If declined, I shall not submit another PC request for at least 90 days. Thank you in advance. OXYLYPSE (talk) 09:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 09:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am requesting to be a pending changes reveiwer because I want to help make Wikipedia a better place and be a part of something bigger than myself. If you give me this great honor I promise to only use my powers for good. WikiEditor5678910 (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has 23 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 16:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiEditor5678910:  Not done; thirty edits is unfortunately not enough to know if we should trust you. Please read over WP:PCCRITERIA, make a few hundred constructive edits to mainspace, and wait a few months before requesting again. Thanks, charlotte 👸♥ 22:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been engaging in constructive talk discussions to contribute to Wikipedia. I would like to contribute more Hajpo (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 7 days and has 28 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 19:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You don't seem like you're experienced enough on Wikipedia yet since you've made only 28 edits in the mainspace and have been around for only seven days. I suggest waiting a month and making a couple hundred edits in the mainspace that demonstrate your understanding of our policies and guidelines mentioned at WP:PCCRITERIA before requesting this right again. Fathoms Below (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to review pending changes. I have reverted vandalism, and I have self-reverted my mistakes (see [2] and [3]). I would like to help review pending changes as a voluntary task. Who am I? / Talk to me! / What have I done? 10:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done @Anonymous1261 while you have a good track record of edits so far and an article published in the mainspace, I see that you have only done a handful of reverts and are not always warning editors after you revert them [4] [5], [6], [7]. When you revert a clearly nonconstructive edit, please make sure to properly warn the user if you can. Some tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet can help with that. I think you can re-apply after maybe a month or two of reverting more nonconstructive edits and gaining a longer track record. Fathoms Below (talk) 19:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand and will I do so.
Who am I? / Talk to me! / What have I done? 03:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been patrolling recent changes for a quiet while about Sri Lankan Articles, and I strongly believe this permission might be helpful. IDB.S (talk) 05:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]