User talk:Kaetalist

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lifeism (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Lifeism.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kaetalist, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom national football team.

The website you used as a reference is not a reliable source. It looks like a blog thrown together by a private individual, i.e. it's just that person's opinion, not something that is actually happening. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 14:18, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is not the case at all and I request that the entry is returned to the edit made.

I am the secretary of The UKFA, it is a functioning organisation and we have been in discussions with both Ministers and so far one of the four home nations football association. The UKFA is the official and only administrator of the United Kingdom National Football Team, simple because until now no one else has cared to do it and it is a fact that we are organizing for a monumental 2015 launch as stated.

This is happening and a lot of work has been done so far. But of course a young association such as ours, similar to "a few men in a pub" that started the FA, we have started up at a scale similar to the FA in those early days. The website is an editable site that was put online to enable the organisation to have online communication, e.g. to have functioning emails and a face to the world. If you wish Wiki to be taken seriously, it should accept information that is true.

In the coming months I can certainly update you, or the page directly with developments as they happen. This is probably the most exciting thing happening in football at the moment and Wiki should not censor important information on a whim, or criticize the quality of an organisations website, it is a bit insulting. Don't Wiki want the best information? If you cannot reality, why have Wiki? What do you want as reference, other than what exists? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.175.101.135 (talk) 15:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lifeism concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lifeism, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lifeism

Hello Kaetalist. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Lifeism".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Lifeism}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Kaetalist! I'm Wikiisawesome. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. /wia🎄/tlk 02:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lifeism (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lifeism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lifeism (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Reads like an essay, not sure it meets notability criteria. Please read WP:CIT on how to properly format citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lifeism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Lifeism

Draft:Lifeism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Lifeism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Lifeism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 13:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]