User talk:KaJunl

Welcome!

Hello, KaJunl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 21:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Law & Order, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amalgamation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Bornhuetter (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ron Bornhuetter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! KaJunl, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment they left was:

References need to be inline with the text, not all at the end. Just like in academic journal articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 18:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi KaJunl,

Wanted to make sure you saw my last post / reply to you on the Help Board (Questions - March 8th):

Hi @Template:KaJunl - Your above post / info very helpful. Thank you. And for also for reading & understanding what i was trying to say (i was merely giving an example, as per others questions... Had no intent of using the Help Pg to list all my suggestions). As a new user, I do find Wiki editing not intuitive easy to use as i might have hoped. So, believe I will take the easy route and just post my findings on the Wiki Talk Page = Film industry in Hamilton, Ontario page... And hopefully at some point in time someone else will incorporate the info in an edit... Seems that the Wki Pg has a lot of issues in regards to objective content as it is / reads like a PR page as per a coment I read on it's Talk Pg (originally i wanted to put my info & reference on a page specific to a particular tv program filming in Hamilton, but that page is way out of date... And the corresponding Talk Pg seems to redirect to a Tv Project Page... Whatever that is). Again more layers of confusion for this newbie. And sorry, unlike one of the suggestions above, I don't have a clue as a New User how to create a Talk Page, nor do I have the time / interest. Too bad Wiki is so complex (although I understand why for consistency across the board) otherwise I may have stuck around longer. For now I'll just take comfort knowing that I can make comments / suggestions / provide important info & reference links on the Talk pages, and hopefully someone else will be inspired to take up the cause & carry thru on updating articles. And I'll still feel like I was able to contribute, and make a difference, albeit very small. I now certainly have a greater respect for those who Edit on this valuable platform. Thanks for all you do, and taking the time to reach out to me here with a detailed reply. Much appreciated. Cdn Rose Cdn Rose (talk) 18:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks again, Cdn Rose Cdn Rose (talk) 17:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cdn Rose: No problem. Honestly, stuff like this - help pages, user pages, etc. - are way more complicated than editing Wikipedia itself, which is actually pretty easy (honestly!). Talk pages are also more complicated than editing pages directly. That said, I find talk pages really helpful because often I'm too lazy to research or make changes myself, but I have thoughts on articles (much like you), so I leave my opinion on talk pages. I hope you stick around, even if only for the occasional edit. All the best! -KaJunl (talk) 19:13, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: E.W. Blanch (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hermera34 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment they left was:

It isn't clear what you are referencing in the sources provided in that they are just URL links, which are subject to rot, or quickly becoming invalid. Please review WP:CITE for future submissions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:E.W. Blanch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hermera34 (talk) 17:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: E.W. Blanch (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:E.W. Blanch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chain-ladder method has been accepted

Chain-ladder method, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Game (rapper)

I saw your note on the BLP Noticeboard and took a look at the article. It's a disaster. Thank you for your efforts. I've deleted some of the worst BLP problems in a couple of sections but there's waaaay more to do. I've gone back to the noticeboard and asked for more help. I'm hopeful that there'll be some sustained attention to the page by BLP noticeboard regulars. David in DC (talk) 17:00, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@David in DC: Thank you so much!! I'll see if I get a chance to help out a little but I'm glad to have someone taking a look/giving input. -KaJunl (talk) 23:13, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Loss development factor has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Loss development factor. Thanks! Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 14:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Did you see what LaMona previously told you? Try to change those external links in the references section to proper references and then put them inline. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 11:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC) @DatGuy: Hi- I understand that references could be improved but is that required for approval? If I recall right the article LaMona commented on was approved without significant changes. I get that it's good to promote best practices but this process isn't trying to make articles perfect before submission right? I'm just trying to add content and hopefully it can be improved by the community over time. -KaJunl (talk) 11:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you're trying to improve Wikipedia, and it's great! However, in Bornhuetter-Ferguson method you really did change a lot. Try and move the references, similar to what you did in this edit. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 11:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy:Okay I will take a look. Out of confusion/curiosity I tried to read up and get some clarity on what the requirements for approval were. I found this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Reviewing_instructions#General_standards_and_invalid_reasons_for_declining_a_submission. To me, this says in-line citations are not required for approval. Can you give me some more info? I'm not writing about a living person or using direct quotes. Again, I understand that this is best practice, but I also feel like it is delaying/discouraging me from adding content to Wikipedia that could be improved upon by others, which I thought was the spirit of Wikipedia. I'm not anti-references, but citations are not be area of expertise (or interest) - I just have what I feel is encyclopedic content that I want to get included, and I think it can be backed up as notable/verifiable (although I use the Articles for Creation wizard to make sure, since I don't totally trust my own judgment of "notable"). Thanks. -KaJunl (talk) 11:32, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to delay the article. Did you see what edit I just made? Do that for the other bullet points with external links. Right now those are external links, not references. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 11:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuy: Thanks I will take a look -KaJunl (talk) 22:52, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will add some when I have a chance- the link I mentioned above specifically says bare URLs are OK though so I am a little confused. Will get back to you if I have more questions later. -KaJunl (talk) 22:56, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loss development factor has been accepted

Loss development factor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TimothyJosephWood 12:37, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Increased limit factor (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Casualty insurance. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For a stand-alone article, there should be in-depth coverage of the importance of increased limit factors.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Increased limit factor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Increased limit factor (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Garchy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read about citing reliable sources - two of these references seem to redirect to the same address, and one of them refers to a slideshow.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Increased limit factor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Garchy (talk) 00:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, KaJunl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Increased limit factor has been accepted

Increased limit factor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

joe decker ^talk 13:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, KaJunl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, KaJunl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sunday morning talk show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Late Edition. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]