User talk:KRKwrites
A belated welcome!
[edit]
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, KRKwrites! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Chocmilk03 (talk) 06:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the cookies - and for the link to the Task Center! KRKwrites (talk) 21:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, KRKwrites, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm glad you took up my invitation to join as you will now be able to benefit more directly from our activities. I realize you have had difficulty in following all the background information on Wikipedia but we have a summary of the essentials in connection with women's biographies in our Ten Simple Rules. I see you have quite a bit more to add to your draft of Abigail Larson but just let me know when you think it's ready for main space and I'll see how it looks. I hope that this will be the first of many more biographies of women as you are progressing very well. Please let me know if you run into any further difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! I'm just finishing up a couple of lists and am planning to move into mainspace today. If you have any thoughts to share I'd certainly really appreciate hearing them! :) KRKwrites (talk) 21:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024
[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Ipigott (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Your first article
[edit]Thank you very much, KRKwrites, for all the time and effort you have spent on your first article Abigail Larson. It's now on main space and I've given it a B rating as it contains lots of detail and is well sourced. I hope this will be the first of many more, whether or not under specific assignments. Please let me know if ever I can help you again. Happy editng!--Ipigott (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
While double-checking the article, I noticed you had specifically introduced British rather than Canadian/American spellings for colour/watercolour and centres but have left American spellings of honor/honorable. As the subject of the article is American, I would suggest you use American spelling.--Ipigott (talk) 10:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Good catch, thank you! We put U's in words like colour here in Canada, so just force of habit. I will go through and correct when I have a moment. KRKwrites (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- You can "correct" it either for Canadian with -our or American -or. As the subject is American, I would suggest you go for American. That will make it easier for future contributors.--Ipigott (talk) 17:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Have you considered nominating the article for GA or FA? I am not an expert, but it seems like it could pass. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry to respond to this a whole month later, but I wanted to thank you for the suggestion - I managed to get the article to GA status, based on your recommendation :) KRKwrites (talk) 20:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Glad I could help, even if it was only giving the idea. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry to respond to this a whole month later, but I wanted to thank you for the suggestion - I managed to get the article to GA status, based on your recommendation :) KRKwrites (talk) 20:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| We don't normally give these to newbies, however your article for your assignment for INF1005: Education and Outreach at the University of Toronto's iSchool is well above what Women in Red expect from new contributors. Impressive work and you attracted serious help and collaboration which is exactly how Wikipedia is created. Well done Victuallers (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Bravo on Abigail Larson as well as collaboratively navigating the steep learning curve that is Wikipedia editing. Also, welcome to Wikiproject Women in Red! Beccaynr (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC) |
Hi there, I don't want to formally pick up the GA review for this article right now, but I thought I would point out a few prose things that you might want to address while you're waiting. 1: the lead is much shorter than a typical GA. If that's all you think is relevant for the lead, it might be a sign that there isn't actually much real content in the article. Maybe you can say something more about her style? 2: the "career" section in particular looks like a list of things she's done rather than a narrative summary. Like #1, this also makes me a bit wary that there's no "there" there. You've got a pretty thorough-looking list of credits at the end of the article, maybe some of the less-important items can be moved there? Or they could be grouped together thematically?
Good luck with it, and welcome! -- asilvering (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- TYSM for the feedback! I was rushing a little to get the article up, and there's more I want to add about style in particular, so maybe I can use some of that to strengthen the lead.
- With the "career" section, I was kind of trying to show the breadth/diversity of her projects and highlight the most notable or interesting ones (bc she kind of has a lot of credits to her name LOL), which I considered to be her own book (Crimson), her work with Netflix, her work with Mike Mignola, and her work with Evanescence. So maybe I can trim it down a bit and use reviews to beef up the article/demonstrate the significance of those projects? KRKwrites (talk) 14:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yep, that all sounds good. You definitely want to mention her solo art book! If there are any reviews of it it would be great to add those, but make sure they're post-publication, professional reviews, not the kinds of blurbs people wrote while it was being kickstarted. Since it was a self-pub that might be hard to do, though. Basically, the more you manage to form the article into something summative/descriptive rather than "a CV in sentences instead of bullet points", the better off you'll be heading into a GAN. -- asilvering (talk) 16:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- I see you got this through to GA! Congrats! -- asilvering (talk) 16:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yep, that all sounds good. You definitely want to mention her solo art book! If there are any reviews of it it would be great to add those, but make sure they're post-publication, professional reviews, not the kinds of blurbs people wrote while it was being kickstarted. Since it was a self-pub that might be hard to do, though. Basically, the more you manage to form the article into something summative/descriptive rather than "a CV in sentences instead of bullet points", the better off you'll be heading into a GAN. -- asilvering (talk) 16:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Did you know
[edit]Hi KRKwrites, if you want Abigail Larson to appear on Wikipedia's main page, you could nominate an interesting fact from the article for Wikipedia:Did you know. Articles can be nominated within 7 days of publication to main space or achieving good article status. TSventon (talk) 13:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ooh, good to know, thank you! I'll take a look-see. :) KRKwrites (talk) 14:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your GA nomination of Abigail Larson
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Abigail Larson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Abigail Larson
[edit]The article Abigail Larson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Abigail Larson and Talk:Abigail Larson/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 23:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Canada Black Music Archives (March 10)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Canada Black Music Archives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, KRKwrites!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! @T.C.G. [talk] 22:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
|
DYK nomination of Abigail Larson
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Abigail Larson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ©Geni (talk) 17:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Abigail Larson
[edit]The article Abigail Larson you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Abigail Larson for comments about the article, and Talk:Abigail Larson/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Congratulations!--Ipigott (talk) 12:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Abigail Larson
[edit]
On 3 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abigail Larson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Canadian League for Peace and Democracy organized a 10,000-person rally at Maple Leaf Gardens in Toronto to protest a 2,500-person fascist rally? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abigail Larson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Abigail Larson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 00:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hahah, I don't think that fact matches the article :'D but this is very exciting, thank you! KRKwrites (talk) 22:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Green GA Editathon June 2024 - Going Back in Time
[edit]
Hello KRKwrites:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in June 2024!
Running from June 1 to 30, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Going Back in Time! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 20 centuries by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Canada Black Music Archives
[edit]
Hello, KRKwrites. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Canada Black Music Archives".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" GA Editathon – October 2024
[edit]
Hello KRKwrites:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) & Alanna the Brave (talk)
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging