User talk:KAL68

KAL68, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi KAL68! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to edit the article, refraining from adding things like the completely unencyclopedic "libtards". --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:44, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift

Can you please stop unnecessary bloating up the article with WP:UNDUE content? There is a tag already in place where a major revamp is going on and the article needs serious pruning down. So please abide by the discussion in talk page and be patient. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How to use edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! – FenixFeather ^(talk)^(Contribs) 00:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Taylor Swift.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Your continuous disruptive editing like this is not appreciated. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:21, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Linda Thompson (actress). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sundayclose (talk) 00:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Oprah Winfrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Women of Brewster Place. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trump

According to WP:LEAD, "As a general rule of thumb, a lead section should contain no more than four well-composed paragraphs and be carefully sourced as appropriate." Also, saying "The World's Billionaires in the world" doesn't sound peculiar to you?Anythingyouwant (talk) 00:32, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Troye Sivan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolverine (comics). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Donald Trump

added links pointing to Scottish and American

Willam Belli

added a link pointing to Ryan Murphy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump, you may be blocked from editing. Graham (talk) 07:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Murph9000. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Caitlyn Jenner, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

I notice that you have been adding unsourced net worth information to many articles about living people. I am assuming good faith, and assume that you must have some form of reliable source for those numbers.

Please do not continue with this without properly citing your source(s). Accurate current information with an inline citation to a reliable source is most welcome, and I encourage you to continue with proper inline citations. I strongly encourage you to revisit your existing edits and add citations to them; I have reverted the change to Caitlyn's page, as it conflicted with the existing citations, but am leaving the others for now. If you do not add citations to them, someone may well revert your changes.

Additionally, I notice that your edit summaries are blank. Please always provide an edit summary. Failing to provide accurate edit summaries and adding unsourced information (even if accurate) to WP:BLP articles could well cause people to view your editing as disruptive, which could ultimately lead to you being blocked (which would be unfortunate, as I believe that you are probably trying to make good/useful contributions). I'll add the standard "please provide summaries" message after this, for your information.

Murph9000 (talk) 02:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Murph9000 (talk) 03:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kylie Minogue. NgYShung ^huh? 04:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please take serious and careful notice of the above. If you take my advice (further above), and always provide both citations and edit summaries, then all will be good (and eventually like the final warning never happened, after some time has passed). If you keep making these edits without summaries and inline citations, you really will be blocked. I've looked through your edit history, and it really does appear to me that you are trying to make a useful constructive contribution, so it would be a great shame for you to be blocked for failing to follow some relatively simple and easy policies and guidelines. If you need help with citations, please ask for it at either the Teahouse or Help Desk. Murph9000 (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Net worth

Hello, you must provide reliable sources if you wish to add net worth to some of the articles, you cannot just add them out of nowhere. Also, celebritynetworth.com and other similar pages are not reliable sources. Mymis (talk) 06:25, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nicki Minaj. Stop adding indiscriminate information. Binksternet (talk) 20:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Binksternet: I don't doing like this sort of thing, but when you have a mainspace-only editor who can't / won't use talk pages, you're left with no choice but to serve a WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT block. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, KAL68. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]